Hello,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:29:19PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> consistently means we do the check in pf_rule_copyin() so both
> DIOCADDRULE and DIOCCHANGERULE have the prio values checked. this in
> turn prevents invalid prio values getting set on a rule via
> DIOCCHANGERULE, which in turn stops a kassert in the ifq priq code
> firing.
>
> i think this fixes
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=c5cf86b2a0fc06f60463e60c02086756747970d4
>
I agree there is a great chance the proposed change will make
syzkaller happy.
> ok?
diff reads OK to me.
OK sashan
