On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 08:34:42AM +0000, Visa Hankala wrote:
> This makes bpf(4) use knote_modify_fn() and knote_process_fn().
>
> Since the code has only one event function, it makes sense to use it
> directly instead of going through struct filterops f_event pointer.
>
> OK?
ok.
>
> Index: net/bpf.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: src/sys/net/bpf.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.214
> diff -u -p -r1.214 bpf.c
> --- net/bpf.c 13 Feb 2022 23:11:10 -0000 1.214
> +++ net/bpf.c 14 Feb 2022 08:08:07 -0000
> @@ -1229,8 +1229,13 @@ filt_bpfrdetach(struct knote *kn)
> }
>
> int
> -filt_bpfread_common(struct knote *kn, struct bpf_d *d)
> +filt_bpfread(struct knote *kn, long hint)
> {
> + struct bpf_d *d = kn->kn_hook;
> +
> + if (hint == NOTE_SUBMIT) /* ignore activation from selwakeup */
> + return (0);
> +
> MUTEX_ASSERT_LOCKED(&d->bd_mtx);
>
> kn->kn_data = d->bd_hlen;
> @@ -1241,25 +1246,13 @@ filt_bpfread_common(struct knote *kn, st
> }
>
> int
> -filt_bpfread(struct knote *kn, long hint)
> -{
> - struct bpf_d *d = kn->kn_hook;
> -
> - if (hint == NOTE_SUBMIT) /* ignore activation from selwakeup */
> - return (0);
> -
> - return (filt_bpfread_common(kn, d));
> -}
> -
> -int
> filt_bpfreadmodify(struct kevent *kev, struct knote *kn)
> {
> struct bpf_d *d = kn->kn_hook;
> int active;
>
> mtx_enter(&d->bd_mtx);
> - knote_assign(kev, kn);
> - active = filt_bpfread_common(kn, d);
> + active = knote_modify_fn(kev, kn, filt_bpfread);
> mtx_leave(&d->bd_mtx);
>
> return (active);
> @@ -1272,12 +1265,7 @@ filt_bpfreadprocess(struct knote *kn, st
> int active;
>
> mtx_enter(&d->bd_mtx);
> - if (kev != NULL && (kn->kn_flags & EV_ONESHOT))
> - active = 1;
> - else
> - active = filt_bpfread_common(kn, d);
> - if (active)
> - knote_submit(kn, kev);
> + active = knote_process_fn(kn, kev, filt_bpfread);
> mtx_leave(&d->bd_mtx);
>
> return (active);
>