Hi all, I was looking into the code of ath, athn and otus to understand the differences. I am wondering if these are fundamentally the same driver or very different. I ask because if one was to port athn to FreeBSD I was suggested to make QR9271 (athn) and extension of either ath or otus. However, upon inspecting the attach methods they seem very different, specifically their open_pipe mappings. Are these entirely different drivers? If not, why did OpenBSD decide to separate them? Thanks!Farhan
