On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 01:22:51PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Vitaliy Makkoveev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Index: sys/sys/filedesc.h
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/filedesc.h,v
> > retrieving revision 1.45
> > diff -u -p -r1.45 filedesc.h
> > --- sys/sys/filedesc.h      4 Jul 2020 08:06:08 -0000       1.45
> > +++ sys/sys/filedesc.h      11 May 2022 19:05:12 -0000
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct filedesc {
> >     u_int   *fd_lomap;              /* [f] bitmap of free fds */
> >     int     fd_lastfile;            /* [f] high-water mark of fd_ofiles */
> >     int     fd_freefile;            /* [f] approx. next free file */
> > -   u_short fd_cmask;               /* [f/w] mask for file creation */
> > +   mode_t  fd_cmask;               /* [f/w] mask for file creation */
> >     u_short fd_refcnt;              /* [K] reference count */
> >     struct rwlock fd_lock;          /* lock for the file descs */
> >     struct mutex fd_fplock;         /* lock for reading fd_ofiles without
> 
> The conversation included a proposal to change fd_refcnt
> 
> And anyways, these are unrelated commits I think.
> 

I said I want to modify `fd_refcnt' with separate commit. Or you
propose to modify `fd_cmask' and `fd_refcnt' with the first commit and
unlock umask(2) with the second?

Reply via email to