On 2022-06-27 13:32 +02, Martijn van Duren <openbsd+t...@list.imperialat.at> wrote: > For the group-id I went with 92, which was used by _rtadvd. It's one up > from _snmpd and has been used previously by _rtadvd, which should make > it the perfect candidate. According to florian rtadvd never stored > anything on disk and chances of any lingering rtadvd binary still around > on a modern install still running approach 0. So I don't see any risks > there. If someone kept the old user/group around sysmerge should change > _rtadvd to _agentx, which florian, sthen, and I also don't see an issue > with.
What I mean was, if they didn't clean up they still have _rtadvd:_rtadvd which will become _rtadvd:_agentx. Operationally this should not a problem, nothing is supposed to use that user.
