On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:34:33PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:08:48AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This diff converts the SRP list to a SMR list in rtsock.c
> > SRP is a bit strange with how it works and the SMR code is a bit easier to
> > understand. Since we can sleep in the SMR_TAILQ_FOREACH() we need to grab
> > a refcount on the route pcb so that we can leave the SMR critical section
> > and then enter the SMR critical section at the end of the loop before
> > dropping the refcount again.
> > 
> > The diff does not immeditaly explode but I doubt we can exploit
> > parallelism in route_input() so this may fail at some later stage if it is
> > wrong.
> > 
> > Comments from the lock critics welcome
> 
> We use `so_lock' rwlock(9) to protect route domain sockets. We can't
> convert this SRP list to SMR list because we call solock() within
> foreach loop.

because of the so_lock the code uses a refcnt on the route pcb to make
sure that the object is not freed while we sleep. So that is handled by
this diff.
 
> We can easily crash kernel by running in parallel some "route monitor"
> commands and "while true; ifconfig vether0 create ; ifconfig vether0
> destroy; done".

That does not cause problem on my system.
 
> > -- 
> > :wq Claudio
> > 
> > Index: sys/net/rtsock.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/rtsock.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.334
> > diff -u -p -r1.334 rtsock.c
> > --- sys/net/rtsock.c        28 Jun 2022 10:01:13 -0000      1.334
> > +++ sys/net/rtsock.c        30 Jun 2022 08:02:09 -0000
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
> >  #include <sys/domain.h>
> >  #include <sys/pool.h>
> >  #include <sys/protosw.h>
> > -#include <sys/srp.h>
> > +#include <sys/smr.h>
> >  
> >  #include <net/if.h>
> >  #include <net/if_dl.h>
> > @@ -107,8 +107,6 @@ struct walkarg {
> >  };
> >  
> >  void       route_prinit(void);
> > -void       rcb_ref(void *, void *);
> > -void       rcb_unref(void *, void *);
> >  int        route_output(struct mbuf *, struct socket *, struct sockaddr *,
> >         struct mbuf *);
> >  int        route_ctloutput(int, struct socket *, int, int, struct mbuf *);
> > @@ -149,7 +147,7 @@ int              rt_setsource(unsigned int, struct 
> >  struct rtpcb {
> >     struct socket           *rop_socket;            /* [I] */
> >  
> > -   SRPL_ENTRY(rtpcb)       rop_list;
> > +   SMR_TAILQ_ENTRY(rtpcb)  rop_list;
> >     struct refcnt           rop_refcnt;
> >     struct timeout          rop_timeout;
> >     unsigned int            rop_msgfilter;          /* [s] */
> > @@ -162,8 +160,7 @@ struct rtpcb {
> >  #define    sotortpcb(so)   ((struct rtpcb *)(so)->so_pcb)
> >  
> >  struct rtptable {
> > -   SRPL_HEAD(, rtpcb)      rtp_list;
> > -   struct srpl_rc          rtp_rc;
> > +   SMR_TAILQ_HEAD(, rtpcb) rtp_list;
> >     struct rwlock           rtp_lk;
> >     unsigned int            rtp_count;
> >  };
> > @@ -185,29 +182,12 @@ struct rtptable rtptable;
> >  void
> >  route_prinit(void)
> >  {
> > -   srpl_rc_init(&rtptable.rtp_rc, rcb_ref, rcb_unref, NULL);
> >     rw_init(&rtptable.rtp_lk, "rtsock");
> > -   SRPL_INIT(&rtptable.rtp_list);
> > +   SMR_TAILQ_INIT(&rtptable.rtp_list);
> >     pool_init(&rtpcb_pool, sizeof(struct rtpcb), 0,
> >         IPL_SOFTNET, PR_WAITOK, "rtpcb", NULL);
> >  }
> >  
> > -void
> > -rcb_ref(void *null, void *v)
> > -{
> > -   struct rtpcb *rop = v;
> > -
> > -   refcnt_take(&rop->rop_refcnt);
> > -}
> > -
> > -void
> > -rcb_unref(void *null, void *v)
> > -{
> > -   struct rtpcb *rop = v;
> > -
> > -   refcnt_rele_wake(&rop->rop_refcnt);
> > -}
> > -
> >  int
> >  route_usrreq(struct socket *so, int req, struct mbuf *m, struct mbuf *nam,
> >      struct mbuf *control, struct proc *p)
> > @@ -325,8 +305,7 @@ route_attach(struct socket *so, int prot
> >     so->so_options |= SO_USELOOPBACK;
> >  
> >     rw_enter(&rtptable.rtp_lk, RW_WRITE);
> > -   SRPL_INSERT_HEAD_LOCKED(&rtptable.rtp_rc, &rtptable.rtp_list, rop,
> > -       rop_list);
> > +   SMR_TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD_LOCKED(&rtptable.rtp_list, rop, rop_list);
> >     rtptable.rtp_count++;
> >     rw_exit(&rtptable.rtp_lk);
> >  
> > @@ -347,8 +326,7 @@ route_detach(struct socket *so)
> >     rw_enter(&rtptable.rtp_lk, RW_WRITE);
> >  
> >     rtptable.rtp_count--;
> > -   SRPL_REMOVE_LOCKED(&rtptable.rtp_rc, &rtptable.rtp_list, rop, rtpcb,
> > -       rop_list);
> > +   SMR_TAILQ_REMOVE_LOCKED(&rtptable.rtp_list, rop, rop_list);
> >     rw_exit(&rtptable.rtp_lk);
> >  
> >     sounlock(so);
> > @@ -356,6 +334,7 @@ route_detach(struct socket *so)
> >     /* wait for all references to drop */
> >     refcnt_finalize(&rop->rop_refcnt, "rtsockrefs");
> >     timeout_del_barrier(&rop->rop_timeout);
> > +   smr_barrier();
> >  
> >     solock(so);
> >  
> > @@ -501,7 +480,6 @@ route_input(struct mbuf *m0, struct sock
> >     struct rtpcb *rop;
> >     struct rt_msghdr *rtm;
> >     struct mbuf *m = m0;
> > -   struct srp_ref sr;
> >  
> >     /* ensure that we can access the rtm_type via mtod() */
> >     if (m->m_len < offsetof(struct rt_msghdr, rtm_type) + 1) {
> > @@ -509,7 +487,8 @@ route_input(struct mbuf *m0, struct sock
> >             return;
> >     }
> >  
> > -   SRPL_FOREACH(rop, &sr, &rtptable.rtp_list, rop_list) {
> > +   smr_read_enter();
> > +   SMR_TAILQ_FOREACH(rop, &rtptable.rtp_list, rop_list) {
> >             /*
> >              * If route socket is bound to an address family only send
> >              * messages that match the address family. Address family
> > @@ -519,7 +498,8 @@ route_input(struct mbuf *m0, struct sock
> >                 rop->rop_proto != sa_family)
> >                     continue;
> >  
> > -
> > +           refcnt_take(&rop->rop_refcnt);
> > +           smr_read_leave();
> >             so = rop->rop_socket;
> >             solock(so);
> >  
> > @@ -579,8 +559,10 @@ route_input(struct mbuf *m0, struct sock
> >             rtm_sendup(so, m);
> >  next:
> >             sounlock(so);
> > +           smr_read_enter();
> > +           refcnt_rele_wake(&rop->rop_refcnt);
> >     }
> > -   SRPL_LEAVE(&sr);
> > +   smr_read_leave();
> >  
> >     m_freem(m);
> >  }
> > 
> 

-- 
:wq Claudio

Reply via email to