On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 01:58:51PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 11:48:41AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > On Jul 6, 2022, at 11:36 AM, Mike Larkin <mlar...@nested.page> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 07:16:26PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:38:32PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:06:55PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [...]
> > >>>
> > >>> Here's the output from a 4 socket 80 thread machine.
> > >>
> > >> Oh nice.  I think this is the biggest machine we've tried so far.
> > >>
> > >>> kern.timecounter reports tsc after boot.
> > >>
> > >> Excellent.
> > >>
> > >>> Looks like this machine doesn't have the adjust MSR?
> > >>
> > >> IA32_TSC_ADJUST first appears in the Intel SDM Vol. 3 some time in
> > >> 2011 or 2012.  I can't find the exact revision.
> > >>
> > >> (I really wish there was a comprehensive version history for this sort
> > >> of thing, i.e. this MSR first appeared in the blah-blah uarch, this
> > >> instruction is available on all uarchs after yada-yada, etc.)
> > >>
> > >> There are apparently several versions of the E7-4870 in the E7
> > >> "family".  If your CPU predates that, or launched 2012-2014, the MSR
> > >> may not have made the cut.
> > >>
> > >> An aside: I cannot find any evidence of AMD supporting this MSR in any
> > >> processor.  It would be really, really nice if they did.  If you (or
> > >> anyone reading) knows anything about this, or whether they have an
> > >> equivalent MSR, shout it out.
> > >>
> > >>> Other than that, machine seems stable.
> > >>
> > >> Good, glad to hear it.  Thank you for testing.
> > >>
> > >> Has this machine had issues using the TSC on -current in the past?
> > >>
> > >> (If you have the time) what does the dmesg look like on the -current
> > >> kernel with TSC_DEBUG enabled?
> > >
> > > Looks like you enabled TSC_DEBUG in your diff, so what I sent you is what 
> > > you
> > > are asking for...?
> >
> > No, I mean on the -current *unpatched* kernel.  Sorry if that wasn't
> > clear.
> >
> > Our -current kernel prints more detailed information if TSC_DEBUG
> > is enabled.  In particular, I'm curious if the unpatched kernel
> > detects any skew or drift on your machine, and if so, how much.
> >
> 
> here you go. I didnt run with all 80 cpus since -current doesnt have my
> " > 64 cpus" diff, but I think this is what you're after in any case.

Yes!  This is what I was looking for, thanks.

> cpu0: TSC skew=0 observed drift=0
> cpu1: TSC skew=112 observed drift=0
> cpu2: TSC skew=102 observed drift=0
> cpu3: TSC skew=-134 observed drift=0
> cpu4: TSC skew=4 observed drift=0
> cpu5: TSC skew=68 observed drift=0
> cpu6: TSC skew=22 observed drift=0
> cpu7: TSC skew=-52 observed drift=0
> cpu8: TSC skew=8 observed drift=0
> cpu9: TSC skew=-18 observed drift=0
> cpu10: TSC skew=10 observed drift=0
> cpu11: TSC skew=76 observed drift=0
> cpu12: TSC skew=-2 observed drift=0
> cpu13: TSC skew=-4 observed drift=0
> cpu14: TSC skew=-2 observed drift=0
> cpu15: TSC skew=-28 observed drift=0
> cpu16: TSC skew=6 observed drift=0
> cpu17: TSC skew=-8 observed drift=0
> cpu18: TSC skew=0 observed drift=0
> cpu19: TSC skew=-32 observed drift=0
> cpu20: TSC skew=0 observed drift=0
> cpu21: TSC skew=-26 observed drift=0
> cpu22: TSC skew=0 observed drift=0
> cpu23: TSC skew=22 observed drift=0
> cpu24: TSC skew=-12 observed drift=0
> cpu25: TSC skew=-14 observed drift=0
> cpu26: TSC skew=76 observed drift=0
> cpu27: TSC skew=-64 observed drift=0
> cpu28: TSC skew=-2 observed drift=0
> cpu29: TSC skew=34 observed drift=0
> cpu30: TSC skew=22 observed drift=0
> cpu31: TSC skew=-58 observed drift=0
> cpu32: TSC skew=-2 observed drift=0
> cpu33: TSC skew=6 observed drift=0
> cpu34: TSC skew=46 observed drift=0
> cpu35: TSC skew=20 observed drift=0
> cpu36: TSC skew=34 observed drift=0
> cpu37: TSC skew=-8 observed drift=0
> cpu38: TSC skew=48 observed drift=0
> cpu39: TSC skew=-10 observed drift=0
> cpu40: TSC skew=0 observed drift=0
> cpu41: TSC skew=72 observed drift=0
> cpu42: TSC skew=2 observed drift=0
> cpu43: TSC skew=-46 observed drift=0
> cpu44: TSC skew=-2 observed drift=0
> cpu45: TSC skew=-14 observed drift=0
> cpu46: TSC skew=-2 observed drift=0
> cpu47: TSC skew=-32 observed drift=0
> cpu48: TSC skew=12 observed drift=0
> cpu49: TSC skew=-16 observed drift=0
> cpu50: TSC skew=84 observed drift=0
> cpu51: TSC skew=-44 observed drift=0
> cpu52: TSC skew=-4 observed drift=0
> cpu53: TSC skew=4 observed drift=0
> cpu54: TSC skew=16 observed drift=0
> cpu55: TSC skew=-56 observed drift=0
> cpu56: TSC skew=-10 observed drift=0
> cpu57: TSC skew=6 observed drift=0
> cpu58: TSC skew=6 observed drift=0
> cpu59: TSC skew=-40 observed drift=0
> cpu60: TSC skew=-4 observed drift=0
> cpu61: TSC skew=-6 observed drift=0
> cpu62: TSC skew=74 observed drift=0
> cpu63: TSC skew=-48 observed drift=0

Reply via email to