On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:03:13AM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > > I prefer the first idiom. If there is an error, do something. We > > should not change the style in opposite direction. This will prevent > > consistency. > > > > I???m not entirely understand you. When we have something to do in the > error path, I use "goto out??? and it works like the first idiom.
Ah, sorry. I was speaking about the != 0. The break, return, goto is fine. error != 0 is just style and does not affect correctness. > >> - if (error) > >> + if (error != 0)
