On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 10:10:53PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > When testing parallel UDP input, I see contention on the netlock
> > > from the protocol timer.  There is a check to avoid loop traversal
> > > if igmp and mld6 are not active.  Move the shortcut to avoid grabbing
> > > netlock.  This should be save as variables igmp_timers_are_running
> > > and mld_timers_are_running are read atomically.  In case we miss
> > > an fast timer due to MP races, we just run it next time.
> > 
> > Could we have a commentary like this before unlocked check? The rest of
> > diff looks ok by me.
> > 
> > > This should be save as variables igmp_timers_are_running
> > > and mld_timers_are_running are read atomically.  In case we miss
> > > an fast timer due to MP races, we just run it next time.
> 
> I commited it with comment.  I wonder if we should use read once.
> It is an unprotected atomic acces.  Read once makes this explicit.
> 

READ_ONCE() is useless here. It will be loaded in any case. But since
this check and `*_timers_are_running' modifications are not serialized,
we could miss this timer run.

>        * Variable igmp_timers_are_running is read atomically.  In case we
>        * miss a fast timer due to MP races, just run it next time.
>        */
> -     if (!igmp_timers_are_running)
> +     if (!READ_ONCE(igmp_timers_are_running))
>               return;


> The common prefix is mld6_ for mld6.c.  Document that
> igmp_timers_are_running and mld_timers_are_running are protected
> by netlock.
> 

These hunks are ok by me.

> ok?
> 
> bluhm
> 
> Index: netinet/igmp.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.79
> diff -u -p -r1.79 igmp.c
> --- netinet/igmp.c    21 Aug 2022 23:04:45 -0000      1.79
> +++ netinet/igmp.c    22 Aug 2022 13:19:51 -0000
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
>  
>  #define IP_MULTICASTOPTS     0
>  
> -int          igmp_timers_are_running;
> +int  igmp_timers_are_running;        /* [N] shortcut for fast timer */
>  static LIST_HEAD(, router_info) rti_head;
>  static struct mbuf *router_alert;
>  struct cpumem *igmpcounters;
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ igmp_fasttimo(void)
>        * Variable igmp_timers_are_running is read atomically.  In case we
>        * miss a fast timer due to MP races, just run it next time.
>        */
> -     if (!igmp_timers_are_running)
> +     if (!READ_ONCE(igmp_timers_are_running))
>               return;
>  
>       NET_LOCK();
> Index: netinet6/mld6.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet6/mld6.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.57
> diff -u -p -r1.57 mld6.c
> --- netinet6/mld6.c   21 Aug 2022 23:04:45 -0000      1.57
> +++ netinet6/mld6.c   22 Aug 2022 13:22:58 -0000
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
>  #include <netinet6/mld6_var.h>
>  
>  static struct ip6_pktopts ip6_opts;
> -static int mld_timers_are_running;
> +int  mld6_timers_are_running;        /* [N] shortcut for fast timer */
>  /* XXX: These are necessary for KAME's link-local hack */
>  static struct in6_addr mld_all_nodes_linklocal = 
> IN6ADDR_LINKLOCAL_ALLNODES_INIT;
>  static struct in6_addr mld_all_routers_linklocal = 
> IN6ADDR_LINKLOCAL_ALLROUTERS_INIT;
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ mld6_init(void)
>       struct ip6_hbh *hbh = (struct ip6_hbh *)hbh_buf;
>       u_int16_t rtalert_code = htons((u_int16_t)IP6OPT_RTALERT_MLD);
>  
> -     mld_timers_are_running = 0;
> +     mld6_timers_are_running = 0;
>  
>       /* ip6h_nxt will be fill in later */
>       hbh->ip6h_len = 0;      /* (8 >> 3) - 1 */
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ mld6_start_listening(struct in6_multi *i
>                   MLD_RANDOM_DELAY(MLD_V1_MAX_RI *
>                   PR_FASTHZ);
>               in6m->in6m_state = MLD_IREPORTEDLAST;
> -             mld_timers_are_running = 1;
> +             mld6_timers_are_running = 1;
>       }
>  }
>  
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ mld6_input(struct mbuf *m, int off)
>                                       in6m->in6m_timer > timer) {
>                                       in6m->in6m_timer =
>                                           MLD_RANDOM_DELAY(timer);
> -                                     mld_timers_are_running = 1;
> +                                     mld6_timers_are_running = 1;
>                               }
>                       }
>               }
> @@ -330,15 +330,15 @@ mld6_fasttimeo(void)
>       /*
>        * Quick check to see if any work needs to be done, in order
>        * to minimize the overhead of fasttimo processing.
> -      * Variable mld_timers_are_running is read atomically.  In case we
> +      * Variable mld6_timers_are_running is read atomically.  In case we
>        * miss a fast timer due to MP races, just run it next time.
>        */
> -     if (!mld_timers_are_running)
> +     if (!READ_ONCE(mld6_timers_are_running))
>               return;
>  
>       NET_LOCK();
>  
> -     mld_timers_are_running = 0;
> +     mld6_timers_are_running = 0;
>       TAILQ_FOREACH(ifp, &ifnet, if_list)
>               mld6_checktimer(ifp);
>  
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ mld6_checktimer(struct ifnet *ifp)
>                       mld6_sendpkt(in6m, MLD_LISTENER_REPORT, NULL);
>                       in6m->in6m_state = MLD_IREPORTEDLAST;
>               } else {
> -                     mld_timers_are_running = 1;
> +                     mld6_timers_are_running = 1;
>               }
>       }
>  }

Reply via email to