12/21/22 00:53, Theo de Raadt пишет: > This went from solving one thing, which was largely agreed. > > Now it is trying to introduce other changes as well. Almost always that > process stinks, unless it goes over the top at saying it is trying to solve > other problems when the diff is re-introduced. It is sneaky, and usually > seems to be a way of trying to get people to sign off because they are tired. > You really do know better. The right way to handle someone doing that is for > us to say "not ok". BTW, this is not a new action by you. I think it is fair > to ask you to stop doing this. > > And anyways, the way you do plural is with adding S, not adding 'S.
I don't see where I've changed anything wrt. an apostrophe. Are you perhaps misunderstanding what the .Ns mdoc(7) macro does? > > But what you want is more like this: > > -utility evaluates > +utility evaluates each > .Ar expression > and writes the result on standard output. > > then you don't need to try this incorrect apostrophy. That's a good idea, thanks. > But it does not belong in this diff, and it does not belong in the same > commit, because that is a procedure violation. Yes this is just manual pages, > but processes have a way of sneaking into other more complex parts of the > tree, so the place to stop this methodology is here. Those don't seem like separate issues to me as changing an argument's markup in SYNOPSIS usually goes with doing the same in DESCRIPTION, no? None of this is intended to be sneaky in any way, it surprises me that you pick it up like that.
