05.04.2023 21:42, Jason McIntyre пишет: > i had originally thought to suggest Li (although i hate it).
mdoc(7) .Dv says ", constant symbols," which fits well. > anyway, when the tags stuff just works, i don;t have any issues. but > then when we start adding markup just to get it working, it > feels less great. doesn;t just being an .It argument promote the item to > being tagged? (well, i guess not, but then shouldn;t it?) Automatic tagging already works great, my impression is that the number of manual tags is comparatively low; I guess mostly .Tg for too complicated markup like the 'route del[ete]' case. .Dv for those route flags isn't really manual tagging either, but just proper markup for fixed strings/implementation details, of which automatic tagging is a great byproduct. 'grep -r "^\.It [a-z]" /usr/share/man/" shows sentences and compound syntactical elements, for which a tag wouldn't make sense as-is, so I think .It's argument should not be tagged automatically (unless it is another macro like .Cm or .Dv): /usr/share/man/man1/dc.1:.It output base must be a number greater than 1 /usr/share/man/man1/ksh.1:.It unary +
