On 2023/05/18 11:28:58 -0600, Todd C. Miller <mill...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2023 18:13:57 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > + if (ret != 0)
> > > + warnx("[Warning] unable to run `%s'", buf);
> >
> > more than "unable to run" I'd say "failed to run" or "command
> > failed" / "exited with nonzero status".
>
> How about "failed with status N"? It can be useful to have the
> exit status since that may indicate the source of the error (though
> perhaps not so much in this case).
I couldn't have come up with something better.
> Updated diff follows.
ok for me.
Thanks!
