On July 7, 2023 12:50:55 PM GMT+02:00, Stefan Sperling <s...@stsp.name> wrote: >On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote: >> For bigger changesets I have started experimenting with using got. >> I don't like to have the whole tree on disk twice so I keep my got and CVS >> checkouts in the same directory. > >Curious. I am not sure how well that will work in practice but >if it works for you then why not. I usually keep them separate, >using temporary CVS checkouts for commits to CVS. > >> A downside of this approach is of course that got always lists all the >> unknown >> CVS dirs in got status. Does anything speak against ignoring them via >> gitignore? > >In any case, I doubt anyone would ever want to check their CVS directories >into Git. So ok by me.
Are there cases when CVS is not a proper directory, as in "**/CVS/" (or just "CVS/" which would work the same AFAIK)? /Alexander > >> diff 7efd0ea99b79bbbda1539b1ae5c635ebfa688970 >> 99115307e40554b41e9d62708e81599b0337da96 >> commit - 7efd0ea99b79bbbda1539b1ae5c635ebfa688970 >> commit + 99115307e40554b41e9d62708e81599b0337da96 >> blob - 3fdff78bcab1fcf6493998cb99b64ff5a5da4f63 >> blob + f07392d0d0015dac869ec1d55affd353aafba670 >> --- .gitignore >> +++ .gitignore >> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ >> **/obj >> **/tags >> +**/CVS >> >> >
