On 2023/10/20 13:57, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/10/19 15:09, Silamael Darkomen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Today I upgraded to the brand new Squid version 6.3 from ports and noticed, > > that Squid no longer starts properly if configured with multiple worker > > processes. > > > > After some debugging the limit from net.unix.dgram.sendspace came up as > > cause. The 2k default is way to low. > > I haven't normally been using multiple workers, but have just given this > a spin with 4 workers on my usual setup (which is doing memory caching > only, no disk cache) and can't trigger it there. > > If you're using disk cache, I assume that would be rock for multiple > workers, in which case this is expected anyway and already documented: > > https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale#write-failure-40-message-too-long > https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/squid/pkg/README-main?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup >
Ah, I'd forgotten that I've already bump dgram limits on that machine as it also runs unbound and I've run into problems with that before..
