Hello Nicolas, hello TB, unfortunately we didn't get quorum in today's meeting, so let's vote this on via email.
Nicolas Barcet [2011-06-06 16:27 +0200]: > I have made a first pass at this and updated the proposed policy > wiki page accordingly. As the goal of the proposal is to recommend > using the Ubuntu policy for most areas but not block a package from > being published unless one of the explicit rules is broken, I have > linked to it as a "should" and listed sections where deviation is > explicitly granted. I like that it is expressed in terms of a delta to the standard Ubuntu policy, although this makes it a little harder to use as a documentation for archive admins; but as the gist of it is quite easy to get used to (allow /opt and library crazyness, and basically ignore copyright and license), I don't see this as a major problem. This looks good to me, +1 from me. It's a nice refinement from the original document you sent around earlier. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
