Hello Rodney, Rodney Dawes [2012-06-14 10:01 -0400]: > Ditën e Tue, 05/06/2012 më 17.25 +0200, Martin Pitt ka shkruar: > > In the first case you should point out how you can verify the actual > > .debs in -proposed, in a full Ubuntu environment (as that can/will > > look differently than sandboxes during package build, and packages in > > PPAs). In the second case you'd keep the individual bug verification, > > but should justify why UI/feature changes are necessary. > > We have our own QA resources on Ubuntu One, and have them install > all the -proposed packages in a full Ubuntu in a VM to test. We > generally do this anyway, as waiting for original reporters to verify > fixes may never happen.
Based on this, a successful history of new microreleases in -proposed, and a working QA process in U1 (which I have experienced myself during my time in ~ubuntu-sru) I +1 this. I just learned that a single +1 from any TB member is sufficient to grant an MRE. I was not aware of that before, and was waiting for the next TB meeting to finish this. Sorry for the delay! Wiki updated: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions?action=diff&rev2=21&rev1=20 Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
