On Monday, February 25, 2013 02:56:49 PM Martin Pitt wrote: ... > fcitx vs. ibus: > * "it provides more efficient and intelligent input experience" > .. compared to what? ibus with sunpinyin/googlepinyin etc.? This > still doesn't describe how you want to fix the indicator, > control-center, language-selector etc. wrt. input configuration, > as they all assume ibus. > > * "it provides skin options and more developing input engines, such > as cloud-pinyin and google-pinyin" > > This suggests that fcitx also just uses the various Pinyin input > flavours, which ibus wraps as well? ...
In Kubuntu we've had requests to ship fcitx as well. We've had feedback that it works better, but it currently supports a narrower range of languages, so I don't think it's suitable as a general Ibus replacement yet. Of course Kylin has a narrow focus, so that's not an issue from their perspective. Scott K -- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
