On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:03:41AM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On 14-04-08 08:02 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Thanks for all the discussion. I think we're getting close to an agreement > > here; at least the broad strokes seem to be agreed already, and we just have > > a few points to fine-tune, so I've begun the process with Canonical IS to > > get this archive brought up so that we can have it in time for 14.04. Do > > folks think we could get a formal decision on this by, say, Thursday April > > 10?
> I think so, I took a look at rev 10 of the "Ubuntu Kylin Archive" wiki, and > am quite happy with it. > The only change I'd like is to rephrase: > "The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams act as the auditors for this > repository..." > to perhaps: > "The Ubuntu archive and Ubuntu Security teams reserve the right to audit this > repository..." > as I don't want that to imply that the teams will be actively auditing the > software in that repository. It will likely only happen if something specific > has been brought up. > With that change, I +1 the proposal and the archive. Ok, +1 from me as well for this change. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
