Brian Murray [2014-05-14 7:32 -0700]: > I don't think iscsitarget should have been moved away from provisional > since we had only a month's worth of data and it was not included in the > provisional status report.
Indeed, that wasn't intended. Thanks for pointing out! > Additionally, it would be useful if when packages were added to the > provisional section we also added a date for reviewing their > provisional status using the same tool. Sounds good. Both done in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions?action=diff&rev2=49&rev1=48 Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
