Hi, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:23:57PM +0100, foss.freedom wrote: > This cause a lot of confusion and DMB have redirected me back to the TB.
We did? This doesn't match my understanding. Please can you tell us what gave you this impression? Usually the DMB decides and defines packagesets, not the TB. Since I'm pretty sure the TB doesn't expect to have any involvement in this, I'm moving this thread back to the devel-permissions@ list, with the TB in Bcc only. > Please can a packageset be officially defined for Ubuntu Budgie? We (the DMB) deferred defining a packageset because packagesets are only used for access control, and we currently don't have anyone approved to be in that access control list anyway. So it shouldn't make any difference whether a packageset is defined right now or not. Have I missed something? Is there any other reason you need a packageset defined right now? Robie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
