Hello Robie, Thank you for your email. I appreciate the review of the Technical Board and the guidance provided.
I am grateful for the recommendations, and having a decision of the Technical Board on the installer provides the clarity we needed. I already made the necessary changes to the spec. I am going to meet with the release team next week. We are going to finalize every point that regards the duties, responsibilities and expectations of the release team in regards to Ubuntu flavors. I will get back to the Technical Board for another round of reviews in around one week from now. Thank you. *Mauro Gaspari* Community Engineer Canonical *[email protected]* <[email protected]> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 8:26 AM Robie Basak <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > Further to the Technical Board meeting on 21 October: > > We appreciate efforts to get clarity on expectations on flavours by > documenting it, and encourage the relevant teams to continue working on > this together. > > One major point of contention seems to be on a requirement to use a > particular installer. We haven't seen sufficient justification to > require this without the flavours' consent, so we cannot accept or > ratify the document as-is. > > Until and unless this is resolved, we consider the status quo to remain > in terms of flavour expectations. > > Unless some other justification to require a specific installer is > provided, we don't think TB involvement or intervention is appropriate > here. Any change to the status quo still requires consent from the > flavours. > > Thanks, > > Robie > On behalf of the Technical Board >
-- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
