> Fully ACK on "excessive". My concern was about the technical publisher being > the one who "knows it when you see it" - Stephen's point that saying "no" > and saying "this is going to take a while" are probably very similar > regarding what happens next seems helpful here.
OK. I think the end-of-the day requirement here is publisher can say "that's an awful lot of changes, it will cost you in terms of priority/delay/etc., do you really want us to do that?", with the ADs/IESG having the final say if it comes to that. In practice, I would expect the above would lead to a discussion in which it is decided how to balance the needs (i.e., just publish w/o changes vs., yep they are important enough they need to get done.), since the discussion will inevitably balance a number of issues that only the IETF can properly weigh. Thomas _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
