Section 3.5 that seems out of place in that it is the only part of
this document that says "the IETF technical publisher will review
this part of documents for technical correctness". It makes sense to
say "if automated tools are available to check formal languages, the
IETF technical publisher should run the tools late in the editing
process", but not to make it seem like that validation is the job of
the technical publisher.
This section might also add a requirement that the IETF technical
publisher should not change any examples (changing words,
reformatting with line breaks, and so on) without explicitly alerting
the document authors. Some formal languages are quite sensitive to
byte counts and line breaks.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
