All the requirements use the "should" language. It is hard to actually mandate anything since what the publisher will do is ultimately determined by the contract.
Stephen > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Techspec] Post-edit tracking > > > In section 3.3: > o Req-POSTEDIT-2 - All changes made to post-approval documents > should be tracked and the changes must be signed off on by the > appropriate technical representatives as defined in the IETF > processes. > Why is this a "should" instead of a "must"? For something as > important as changes made after the WG and IESG reviews, it would > seem that tracking and sign-off would be mandatory. > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > --VPN Consortium > > _______________________________________________ > Techspec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec > _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
