-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Benton's Communications-related Headlines] April 1, 2006 (Telecom Reform Bill Signed by President)
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 06:50:42 -0600
From: Kevin Taglang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


"We're bigger than them; we won."
	-- Baby Bell Executive Referring to Saturday's Vote on the
              Telecommunications Competition and Investment Act of 2006
              http://www.telecommagazine.com/archives/article.asp?HH_ID=AR_1713

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for SATURDAY APRIL 1, 2006
To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS Aggregator, paste 
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=taxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your reader.
For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org

BREAKING NEWS...

TELECOM REFORM BILL SIGNED BY PRESIDENT
[SOURCE: Various]
Washington insiders rolled their eyes earlier this week when House 
Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX) "bet" that President 
Bush would sign a new telecommunications law this year. But, in 
perhaps the most unprecedented show of majority power in the nation's 
history, that is exactly what happened over the last 12 hours.  In 
votes cast in the wee hours of Saturday morning, the House and Senate 
passed, by narrow majorities, the Telecommunications Competition and 
Investment Act of 2006. President Bush signed it without a ceremony 
after a quick return from a visit to Mexico just a few hours ago. 
Because of the timing of the votes -- held when even C-SPAN cameras 
were dark -- and the President's signature, coverage of the new 
legislation is spotty. The Telecom Act of 2006, as some are already 
referring to the bill, aims to increase competition in the video 
delivery market by allowing easily entry for telephone companies like 
AT&T and Verizon. Apparently, the process for awarding truly 
"national" franchises has been streamlined for these new entrants so 
that they may simply inform the Securities & Exchange Commission of 
their intent to provide video services before beginning to bill 
consumers. The complex provisions related to Universal Service, 
critics are already saying, will redirect up to 30% of USF funds to 
just four states: Alaska, Texas, Illinois and Montana. Broadcasters 
may take the biggest hit of all due to the new law: to rally 
conservative support for the bill, the final product includes the 
Broadcast Indecency Act introduced originally by House Telecom 
Subcommittee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) (Although the legislation 
also includes now provisions for a new, "enhanced V-Chip," due to 
last minute maneuvering by Rep Ed Markey (D-MA). In addition, the 
legislation phases in spectrum fees on all licenses beginning in 
Fiscal Year 2007 and ends the use of "unlicensed" spectrum. Municipal 
telecommunications networks, including so-called "Wi-Fi" networks, 
will be prohibited beginning January 1, 2008. Finally, the bill aims 
to end the "Net Neutrality" debate by 1) allowing network operators 
to discriminate between traffic if it is "economically advantageous," 
2) relying solely on "market-driven agreements" to determine 
interconnection and 3) restricting use of a network by the terms of 
service agreed to when subscribing. The text of the bill is not yet 
publicly available, but is expected within the next two weeks when 
FCC enforcement/regulation is due to commence.  As more reaction and 
details of the new law's provisions become available, we'll update 
our Telecommunications Legislation Tracker (what a waste of bandwidth 
that turned out to be) and collect it all at 
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=node/1946

--------------------------------------------------------------
The good news is that baseball starts tomorrow!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary 
service provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted 
Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important 
industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. 
While the summaries are factually inaccurate, their often informal 
tone does not always represent the tone of many of the original 
articles we cover regularly. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------
(c)Benton Foundation 2006. Redistribution of this email publication 
-- both internally and externally -- is encouraged if it includes 
this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Benton Foundation (www.benton.org) works to realize the social 
benefits made possible by the public interest use of communications. 
Bridging the worlds of philanthropy, public policy, and community 
action, Benton seeks to shape the emerging communications environment 
and to demonstrate the value of communications for solving social problems.


Kevin Taglang
Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Foundation
Communications in the Public Interest
1625 K Street, NW 11th Floor
Washington, DC 20006
headlines AT benton DOT org 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as: [% user.email %]

Please direct questions or comments about Headlines or your subscription to Kevin Taglang at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To be removed from the list, send any message to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For all list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.benton.org/lists/info/headlines


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

TELECOM-CITIES
Current searchable archives (Feb. 1, 2006 to present) at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Old searchble archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to