Here is video of ACLU directly asking Chris Vein how he will support
Free Speech and address Privacy concerns on the SF TechConnect WiFi
Project on May 30th in San Jose.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8EAMKQMLnRQ (5 mins)

As was the case at the May 19th and previous city hearings, DTIS
continues to refuse to agree to any baselines or engage in a public
discussion of these issues - instead shrouding the discussion in the
need to keep the negotiation secret and to get the Best Deal for the
city - yet they will not say what the best deal is.  He also advocate
that the private firm must make money on the initiative - We are giving
the company free access to all the city property like light poles and
building tops.  The company Earthlink/Google need to figure out how to
make money with the conditions the city puts on the initiative - not
the other way around.  Plus 5 other vendors bid the project - if
Earthlink/Google can't meet the demands then the city can go to these
vendors.  Nicky Ozer of ACLUNC then points out that there are other
costs besides money here.  There was no discussion of getting digital
inclusion funding as has been the case in the Philly deal.  It is funny
that Chris mentions the 62 criteria used to judge the vendors because
they refuse to released the detailed scoring of the proposals - only
summary scores, and they refuse to provide the answers to the 15 oral
interview questions.  One of the reviewers was later quoted

Also why can't we see a significant pilot of the technology before the
contract is signed?  We want to see real world how privacy, capacity,
coverage, work before the city commits to this WiFi Franchise Monopoly.

This is looking more and more like the ComCast deal - signed sealed
delivered contract that the Supervisors are forced to approve without
the public playing a part in the criteria of the deal.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

TELECOM-CITIES
Current searchable archives (Feb. 1, 2006 to present) at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Old searchble archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to