>
> The Future Of Newspapers
>
> Clayton M. Christensen and Andrew B. Davis
>
>  10.11.06, 6:00 AM ET
> http://www.forbes.com/2006/10/10/leadership-newspapers-media-lead- 
> innovation-cx_cc_1011clayton.html
>
> The Big Three U.S. auto manufacturers. Downtown department stores.
> Video rental stores. Minicomputer manufacturers. All fell, or are
> falling, in the face of competitors who used disruptive innovations
> to change the game. Is there reason to believe that old-school
> newspaper companies can survive?
>
> After spending a year studying the problem in the course of the
> “Newspaper Next” project that Innosight conducted with the American
> Press Institute, our answer is a resounding yes.
>
> Our belief is not an academic one. Over the last five months, we
> conducted demonstration projects at a handful of U.S. newspaper
> companies. Although it’s too early to point to billion-dollar
> businesses, we have seen mind-sets shift and managers get excited as
> they see the massive growth potential that still exists for the
> industry.
>
> But success will not come easily. Driven by shifting customer
> behaviors, the media landscape is changing at an unprecedented pace.
> Fundamental changes are reshaping the media environment and are
> sending waves of disruption throughout the industry.
>
> Newspaper companies do, however, have real assets to bring to the
> table. Despite declining circulation, the daily paper still produces
> cash flow that many other industries eye with envy. The core content
> produced by newspapers is the basis for many of the industry's
> disruptors. Without newspaper content, there isn’t much news for
> television to report, bloggers would have less to blog about, and
> Yahoo! News and Google News would be blank pages. Furthermore,
> newspapers have strong brands and highly skilled employees.
>
> Newspaper companies have only begun to scratch their innovation
> potential. To succeed, they have to learn to look at markets in new
> ways. They must invest to create new capabilities and rethink the way
> they work individually and collectively.
>
> The mind-set shift starts with how they think about consumers. For a
> long time, newspapers stood by as readership slid. Print executives
> tried to answer the question, “How can we convince more people to
> read our paper?” But the question has to be “What indispensable roles
> can we play in the lives of the consumers we want to serve?”
>
> Just as GateHouse Media New England is doing with WickedLocal.com
> (one of our demonstration projects) and Cox Communications is doing
> with Kudzu.com, newspapers must help consumers--especially those that
> don’t read the newspaper--solve the pressing problems of their daily
> lives. These solutions are likely to require new skills, such as
> constructing databases of local information, tapping into the
> “collective wisdom” of people who live in the community and building
> platforms for communities to form.
>
> Newspaper companies must rethink their revenue equation as well. For
> generations, display advertising and classified advertising have
> powered the newspaper business model. The companies that place those
> advertisements are--not surprisingly--called “advertisers.”
>
> Many newspaper publishers have fooled themselves into thinking that
> the problem their business customers seek to solve is a lack of
> advertising. That’s not right. Advertising is a compensating
> behavior. In its demonstration project, the Richmond Times-Dispatch
> interviewed more than 40 businesses that don’t advertise in the
> newspaper. Not one said the problem they are trying to solve is a
> lack of advertising. Instead, they are looking to build relationships
> with consumers, create brands, attract employees and simplify back-
> end operations. Those are the real jobs to be done.
>
> Newspaper companies must help current advertisers and businesses and
> individuals that don’t advertise address these issues. They must do
> so by finding ways that better utilize existing mechanisms such as
> niche publications and special events. They’ll also need to tap into
> emerging approaches such as paid search, consumer direct, targeted
> advertising and lead generation.
>
> These aren’t pie-in-the-sky models. These are real approaches that
> already are making many non-newspaper companies (and a few newspaper
> companies) big bucks. Utilizing these approaches can enable newspaper
> companies to reach business customers that historically couldn’t or
> wouldn’t use newspaper products.
>
> Realizing this potential requires developing new capabilities. The
> Boston Globe--one of our demonstration projects--sought to develop
> new ways to reach small businesses that didn’t use any of the Globe’s
> products. The Globe’s idea? Resell a “search engine marketing”
> product from a third-party vendor. One key to success? Using low-cost
> sales channels like telesales to reach the market.
>
> Newspaper companies shouldn’t approach the innovation challenge
> alone. There are opportunities for companies to collaborate online in
> powerful ways, particularly to serve national companies that want to
> tap into the vast reach of the more than 1,400 local newspapers that
> collectively reach more than 55 million consumers.
>
> There are dozens of other specific suggestions that appear in the
> Newspaper Next report, including a step-by-step method for
> innovation, a “game plan” for growth, a dashboard to track progress,
> reviews of the demonstration projects, and the results of a survey of
> industry leaders that indicates a clear desire for collaboration.
>
> Above all else, newspaper companies must commit to doing things
> differently, and they must back that commitment with action. Business
> as usual will not suffice. Cutting costs and hoping the current storm
> will subside will not work.
>
> The payoff of all of this can be significant: Companies can launch
> new offerings, grow in new directions and harness the disruptive
> forces that have threatened the industry. They can move from
> monolithic product offerings to a vibrant portfolio of products,
> services and business models.
>
> The Desert Sun in Palm Springs, Calif., worked hard over its four-
> month demonstration project to develop structures and processes to
> make innovation sustainable. Its efforts energized the newsroom,
> helped improve existing products and sparked innovative ideas. Its
> newly constituted “Big Brain” panel helped to shepherd an idea for a
> Web site where restaurants can post coupons for free, called
> FoodPsycho.com.
>
> “Yes, these are challenging times for our industry,” Desert Sun
> Editor Steve Silberman said. “But I also can’t think of a better time
> to be a journalist, a more exciting time to be a journalist, where
> there’s more possibilities and more hope.”
>
> Through its findings and initial implementation via the pilot
> programs, Newspaper Next has demonstrated that through a process for
> innovation-driven growth, the newspaper industry can not only
> survive, it can grow and prosper.
>
> Clayton M. Christensen is a Harvard Business School professor and the
> founder of Innosight, a Watertown, Mass., innovation consulting
> company. Andrew B. Davis is the president of the American Press
> Institute. Innosight and API collaborated on the Newspaper Next
> project. The final report is available at www.newspapernext.org.
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

TELECOM-CITIES
Current searchable archives (Feb. 1, 2006 to present) at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Old searchble archives at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to