it does not need to convert into pipe format.
for example take a look at one of my custom jquery methods:
def String getSelectorText(String jqSelector){
String[] arr = [jqSelector];
String st = commandProcessor.doCommand("getSelectorText", arr);
return st;
}
so you need to pass in the method name, and an array of arguments to
the method, and it returns a string.
On Jan 21, 4:27 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> It wouldn't be difficult to use Groovy meta programming to forward
> the
> missing method to the Dispatcher class, or we can create a custom
> class for
> this purpose.
>
> The difficult part would still be Selenium RC part. If I remember
> correctly,
> it needs to convert the method into pipe format command. For custom
> methods,
> do you have a generic way to do the conversion?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jian
>
> On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Mikhail Koryak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > How hard would it be to use groovy to make tellurium be user-
> > extendable. what i mean, is selenium has CustomSelenium where you can
> > add some functions and as long as you have them in the user-extensions
> > you can call custom functions.
>
> > With tellurium this is not as easy because you have to go through the
> > accessor or the dispatcher and modify multiple files to make a simple
> > change. Can we use the power of groovy to make this easier?
>
> > so if a method is not found, and it returns a value, call the
> > dispatcher with the method, and if it returns a void, call the
> > accessor, or something like that? What are your thoughts?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tellurium-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
