Hari, We really appreciate you for sharing your experiences with Tellurium. Please keep supporting Tellurium.
We will add a wiki page to include all Tellurium contributors. One important criterion is how active the user is in Tellurium user group. Thanks again, Jian On Feb 22, 7:43 am, Harihara Vinayakaram <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > I thought I will write about my experiences with Tellurium. I have been > using Tellurium for about a week now . > > Our application is coded using Seam (JSF ) , Facelets and JQuery. We > initially were using RichFaces for Ajax and then replaced a lot of RichFaces > with Jquery > > We initially had tests that were written in Ruby using the Selenium Ruby > Driver. The tests had the problem of being too brittle. We tried to convert > them to using XPath but the support for XPath in the selenium version that > we were using was too weak . A lot of standard XPath was breaking. > > We moved to using Canoo Web Test with the tests in groovy. This had the > advantage of having programmers write tests easily . We had a bit of > struggle to get a TestRunner but we adopted the WebTest framework in Grails > for our tests. The tests were coded using XPath and were far less brittle . > But since we moved to JQuery a lot of functionality could not be tested > using the WebTest framework. The advantage of the WebTest Framework was the > incredibly good reports. > > I have been using Tellurium for a week now and ported a lot of tests from > Web Test into this. Since a lot of tests were in groovy it was easy to move > them to this framework . Also this solved a problem of unable to test JQuery > functionality since we could get the browsers to work without too much > issue. My initial feedback has been it is a great framework. The only thing > I am missing from the Canoo framework is the reports. For example we have > a Redmine system which contained the Tests and descriptions and the test > cases in groovy used to pick them up using Atom and the Reports contained > the description. I tried to find ways of customizing the JUnit reports > but that does not seem to a thing that is easily accomplished > > I have had some hitches in using the methodMissing which John reports > seems to be a groovy 1.5.7 problem and works with 1.6 > > Other than this my initial week's experience of using this framework has > been positive and I look forward to using this more. > > Thanks for the great work and hopefully will be able to contribute to this > too as we go forward > > Regards > Hari --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
