Similar problems reported here, http://www.nabble.com/NetBeans:--abstract-method-setMetaClass%28groovy.lang.MetaClass%29-in-groovy.lang.GroovyObject-td19754431.html
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=153714 and the suggestion is to use groovyc instead of javac. Please try the joint compilation groovyc in a similar way to the one in our sample ant script. If still not working, please trim off the sensitive data from your sample project, pack the whole project, and send the file to my email account so that I can take a look and try to reproduce your problem. Thanks, Jian On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Jian Fang <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Gary, > > Could you take a look at our sample ANT build script here > > http://code.google.com/p/aost/wiki/TelluriumSampleAntBuildScript > > or the build script from our trunk. > > http://code.google.com/p/aost/source/browse/trunk/core/build.xml > > > http://code.google.com/p/aost/source/browse/trunk/reference-projects/tellurium-junit-java/build.xml > > Since we moved from ANT to Maven pretty long time ago, I am not sure the > ant script still works fine. But at least give you some idea of how it > should > look like. > > Another suggestion is to use Groovy 1.6.0 to see if the problem goes away > since Tellurium 0.6.0 is tested with Groovy 1.6.0. Groovy 1.6.3 may also > work > fine but we haven't tested it. > > Let us know if this could help. > > Thanks, > > Jian > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:42 PM, lokibear <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thank you Jian for your reply. >> >> We use ant to build, and checking in verbose mode revealed no >> duplication of Groovy versions. I then removed the 1.6.3 version that >> I'm explicitly adding to the classpath to double-check, and the test >> failed to compile (groovy.lang not found, etc.), so I'm pretty >> confident that there is only the one version of Groovy that I'm >> loading. Can you think of a different way that I could confirm this? >> >> Otherwise, can you think of any other cause for this behavior? >> >> Thanks again for your time on this. I see a lot of value in using >> Tellurium, and hope we can find some way to get around this problem. >> >> Best Regards, >> Gary >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
