Hi,
Seems your UI module is not correct. The Div is not a container type object,
you should use Container instead.
Since Tellurium ui object is an abstract object, there is really no need to
define a separate a Div object. Perhaps
we should remove the Div object from Tellurium core.
Here is the UI module I used
class DListModule extends DslContext {
public void defineUi(){
ui.Container(uid: "div1", clocator: [tag: "div", id: "div1"]) {
Container(uid: "div2", clocator: [id: "div2"]) {
List(uid: "list1", clocator: [tag: "ul"], separator: "li")
{
Container(uid: "all")
{
List(uid: "list2", clocator: [tag: "ul"],
separator: "li") {
}
}
}//end list1
}//end div2
}//end div1
}
}
The Test case is simple as follows.
class DListModule_UT extends GroovyTestCase {
public void testDump(){
DListModule dlm = new DListModule();
dlm.defineUi();
dlm.dump("div1");
dlm.dump("div1.div2.list1");
}
}
The output is as follows,
Dump locator information for div1
-------------------------------------------------------
div1: //descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]
div1.div2:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]
div1.div2.list1:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul
div1.div2.list1[1]:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]
div1.div2.list1[1].list2:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]/descendant-or-self::ul
div1.div2.list1[1].list2[1]:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]
-------------------------------------------------------
Dump locator information for div1.div2.list1
-------------------------------------------------------
div1.div2.list1:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul
div1.div2.list1[1]:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]
div1.div2.list1[1].list2:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]/descendant-or-self::ul
div1.div2.list1[1].list2[1]:
//descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::*...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]/descendant-or-self::ul/li[1]
-------------------------------------------------------
Let me know if this works for you.
Thanks,
Jian
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will create a test case to re-produce your problem and see what happens.
>
> BTW, is the waitForPageToLoad problem resolved?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jian
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:12 AM, d32 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jian,
>>
>> We have few querries regarding the XPath generated at the runtime and
>> getListSize method.
>>
>> Html:
>> <div id="div1">
>> ............
>> ............
>> <div id="div2">
>> ..............
>> .............
>> <ul>//list1
>> <li>
>> <ul>//list 2
>> <li></li>
>> </ul>
>> </li>
>> <li></li>
>> </ul>
>>
>> </div>
>>
>> </div>
>>
>> UIModule:
>>
>> ui.Container(uid:"div1", clocator:[tag:"div", id:"div1"]) {
>>
>> Div(uid:"div2", clocator:[id:"div2"])
>>
>> List(uid:"list1", clocator:[tag:"ul"], separator:"li")
>> {
>> Container(uid:"all")
>> {
>> List(uid:"list2", clocator:[tag:"ul"], separator:"li"){
>> }
>> }
>>
>> }//end list1
>>
>> }//end div2
>> }//end div1
>>
>> For UID div1.div2.list1 following xpath is generated
>> //descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-self::ul
>>
>> Shouldn't it include second div also like:
>> //descendant-or-self::d...@id="div1"]/descendant-or-
>> self::d...@id="div2"]/descendant-or-self::ul
>>
>> what if there is list between div1 and div2, according to the xpath
>> generated it will process that list instead of list1.
>>
>> if xpath had also include div2 this wont happen.
>>
>> Please advice us why this is happening (exclusion of div2 from the
>> xpath)
>>
>> Second query:
>> when we use getListSize(div1.div2.list1) it returns 3 (size of list1 +
>> size of list 2)
>> As per our understanding when we say size of a list it should include
>> LIs for that list only, it should not include nested list.
>>
>> you could add another method that gives the size of a list excluding
>> nested lists.
>>
>>
>> Please advice us on the same.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Prashant Dhaka
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "tellurium-users" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tellurium-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
