It would be fine as long as people do not have to maintain multiple configuration files on different location.
Cheers Haroon On 1 April 2010 14:01, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > I see, you prefer the existing name TelluriumConfig.groovy, right? > > Tellurium needs to load configuration file first and it is not a good idea > to add another configuration > file. The other option would be to give Tellurium to select one of couple > files to load. > > TelluriumConfig.groovy gets compiled by gmaven itself would not do any harm > and just does not > look cool. If people prefer the existing name, we can keep it. > > Thanks, > > Jian > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Robert Fletcher < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm working on integrating Tellurium with Grails and the existing name >> would be more in line with conventions there. Would it be possible to >> tell Tellurium which file to use? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "tellurium-users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tellurium-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
