Thanks for your efforts Jian, I thought I was using the latest
snapshot when I created the testng maven project but my modified test
case was using the package org.tellurium instead of
org.telluriumsource, perhaps I had started with a dated tutorial on
the web.
Now that my dependencies are sorted I can communicate another issue
that has popped up. My table key/value assertion code mentioned in
previous posts in this thread is a little more complicated by virtue
of the fact that my view generates not one but a list of multiple
tables, so it would make sense to define a list of tables in a
Tellurium module, which I have done. The problem I have encountered is
that my list element count is higher than expected (4 instead of 2)
and I cannot reference the elements I am interested in via a hierarchy
of uids (see DocumentShowModule.getCellTextForFirstDetailGroup() and
DocumentShowModule.printDetailGroupTitles()). This is best
demonstrated with a cut down version of my html and test code. I have
included two source files within this post, a simple java test class
and a groovy ui module.
Am I missing the mark here with my List UI object definition? It seems
pretty straight forward.
DocumentShowViaJettyTestNGTestCase.java
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
package test;
import org.telluriumsource.test.java.TelluriumTestNGTestCase;
import org.telluriumsource.test.mock.MockHttpServer;
import org.testng.annotations.*;
import static org.testng.Assert.*;
import module.DocumentShowModule;
public class DocumentShowViaJettyTestNGTestCase extends
TelluriumTestNGTestCase {
private static DocumentShowModule dsm;
private static MockHttpServer server;
@BeforeClass
public static void initUi() {
server = new MockHttpServer(8080);
server.registerHtmlBody("/documentShow.html",
DocumentShowModule.HTML_BODY);
server.start();
dsm = new DocumentShowModule();
dsm.defineUi();
connectSeleniumServer();
useCssSelector(true);
useTelluriumEngine(true);
useTrace(true);
}
@BeforeMethod
public void connectToLocal() {
connectUrl("http://localhost:8080/documentShow.html";);
}
@Test
public void testDocumentShow(){
dsm.printDetailGroupTitles();
}
@AfterClass
public static void tearDown(){
showTrace();
server.stop();
}
}
DocumentShowModule.groovy
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
package module
import org.telluriumsource.dsl.DslContext
/**
* This UI module file represents Document Show page DOM hierarchies
and provides methods
* for interaction with elements that make up said hierarchies.
*/
public class DocumentShowModule extends DslContext {
public void defineUi() {
ui.List(uid:'DetailGroupCollection', clocator: [tag: 'div',
class: 'detailGroupCollection'], separator: 'div') {
TextBox(uid: 'DetailGroupTitle', clocator: [tag: 'div',
class: 'detailGroupTitle'], self: 'true')
Table(uid:'FieldTable', clocator: [class:'keyValueTable'])
{
TextBox(uid: '{row: all, column: 1}', clocator: [tag:
'td'], self: 'true')
TextBox(uid: '{row: all, column: 2}', clocator: [tag:
'td'], self: 'true')
}
}
}
/**
* Should dump the table cell text for the 2nd keyValueTable
defined in HTML_BODY.
*/
def getCellTextForFirstDetailGroup() {
def tableCellText =
getAllTableCellText("DetailGroupCollection[1].FieldTable")
println("\ntableCellText: ${tableCellText.dump()}\n")
tableCellText
}
/**
* Should print a list size of 2 and the title 'Detail Group Title
B' for the 2nd keyValueGroup.
*/
def printDetailGroupTitles() {
println("\nlistSize: ${getListSize('DetailGroupCollection')}")
println("\ntableCellTitle: $
{getText('DetailGroupCollection[1].DetailGroupTitle')}\n")
}
public static String HTML_BODY ="""
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-
Type">
<title>Show Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="detailGroupCollection">
<div class="detailGroup">
<div class="detailGroupTitle">Detail Group Title A</div>
<table class="keyValueTable">
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td id="document.key1" class="label">Key 1</td>
<td>1111</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td id="document.key2" class="label">Key 2</td>
<td>2222</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td id="document.key3" class="label">Key 3</td>
<td>3333</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td id="document.key4" class="label">Key 4</td>
<td>4444</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div class="detailGroup">
<div class="detailGroupTitle">Detail Group Title B</div>
<table class="keyValueTable">
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td id="document.key5" class="label">Key 5</td>
<td>5555</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td id="document.key6" class="label">Key 6</td>
<td>6666</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td id="document.key7" class="label">Key 7</td>
<td>7777</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td id="document.key8" class="label">Key 8</td>
<td>8888</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
"""
}
On Apr 19, 10:23 am, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
> I created a Tellurium TestNG project and could not reproduce your problem.
> Here are my html snippet, Ui Module, and test case.
>
> HTML: (resources/org/telluriumsource/html/Dynamic.html)
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
> <html>
> <head>
> <title></title>
> </head>
> <body>
>
> <table class='keyValueTable'>
> <tr>
> <td>AAA</td>
> <td>111</td>
> </tr>
> <tr>
> <td>BBB</td>
> <td>222</td>
> </tr>
> <tr>
> <td>CCC</td>
> <td>333</td>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
> <div id="view">
> <p>
> <a id=”111_222”>View</a>
> </p>
>
> <p>
> <a id=”333_444”>View</a>
> </p>
>
> <p>
> <a id=”555_666”>View</a>
> </p>
> </div>
>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> UI Module:
>
> class DynamicModule extends DslContext {
>
> public void defineUi(){
> ui.Table(uid: "keyValue", clocator: [class: "keyValueTable"]){
> TextBox(uid: "{row: any, column: 1} as p1, var key", clocator: [text:
> "key"], self: "true")
> TextBox(uid: "{row: any, column: 2} as p2, var value", clocator:
> [text: "value"], self: "true")
> }
>
> ui.List(uid: "Views", clocator: [tag: "div", id: "view"], separator:
> "p"){
> UrlLink(uid: "{any}, var view_id", clocator: [id: "view_id", text:
> "View"])
> }
> }
>
> }
>
> Test Case:
>
> public class DynamicTestNGTestCase extends TelluriumMockTestNGTestCase {
> private static DynamicModule dm;
>
> @BeforeClass
> public static void initUi() {
> registerHtml("Dynamic");
>
> dm = new DynamicModule();
> dm.defineUi();
> useTelluriumEngine(true);
> useTrace(true);
> }
>
> @Test
> public void getAllText(){
> String[] texts = dm.getAllTableCellText("keyValue");
> assertNotNull(texts);
> for(String text: texts){
> System.out.println("Text: " + text);
> }
> }
>
> @AfterClass
> public static void tearDown(){
> showTrace();
> }
>
> }
>
> Output:
>
> Parse configuration file: TelluriumConfig.groovy from project root directory
> Configure UI Object Builders using configuration
> Configure widget modules using configuration
> Configure event handler using configuration
> Configure data accessor using configuration
> Configure dispatcher using configuration
> Configure Embedded Selenium Server using configuration
> Warning: No user-extensions.js
> log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
> (org.openqa.selenium.server.SeleniumServer).
> log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
> Configure Selenium Client using configuration
> TE: Name: getAllTableBodyText, start: 1271636312536, duration: 31ms
> TE: Found exact match for UI Module 'keyValue':
> {"id":"keyValue","relaxDetails":[],"matches":1,"relaxed":false,"score":100.0,"found":true}
> Text: AAA
> Text: 111
> Text: BBB
> Text: 222
> Text: CCC
> Text: 333
> TE: Start Time: 1271636312536
> End Time: 1271636312567
> Total Runtime: 31ms
> Name: getAllTableBodyText, count: 1, total: 31ms, average: 31ms
>
> ===============================================
> Custom suite
> Total tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Skips: 0
> ===============================================
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Seems your 0.7.0 snapshot is not the latest one because the line number of
> > the following line in UiObject.groovy is 284, not 234 as shown in the
> > exception stack trace.
>
> > println(i18nBundle.getMessage("Container.CannotFindUIObject" , {[child ,
> > this.uid]}))
>
> > The command for a tellurium testNG project should be as follows.
>
> > mvn archetype:create -DgroupId=your_group_id -DartifactId=your_artifact_id
> > -DarchetypeArtifactId=tellurium-testng-archetype
> > -DarchetypeGroupId=org.telluriumsource -DarchetypeVersion=0.7.0-SNAPSHOT
> > -DarchetypeRepository=http://maven.kungfuters.org/content/repositories/snapshots
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Jian
>
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:45 AM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Thanks for your responses Jian,
>
> >> I have tried your suggestion to ' validate the key value pairs from
> >> the table' by defining a UI module as:
>
> >> ui.Table(uid: "keyValue", clocator: [class: "keyValueTable"]){
> >> TextBox(uid: "{row: all, column: 1}", clocator: [tag: 'td'],
> >> self: "true")
> >> TextBox(uid: "{row: all, column: 2}", clocator: [tag: 'td'],
> >> self: "true")
> >> }
>
> >> I am however seeing a strange error message in my test result. I don't
> >> know if a stack will suffice but I will include it here in case it
> >> looks familiar to anyone.
>
> >> I generated a 0.7.0 snapshot testng maven project using the maven
> >> tellurium testng archetype and have been sucessfully executing a basic
> >> test, but now that I am trying to interact with an html table I am
> >> seeing this rather odd error:
>
> >> groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: i18nManager
> >> for class: org.tellurium.object.TextBox
>
> >> Any idea what I might be doing wrong here? I am using everything out
> >> of the box, including TelluriumConfig.groovy
>
> >> The full stack is as follows:
>
> >> groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: i18nManager
> >> for class: org.tellurium.object.TextBox
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdapter.java:
> >> 49)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.GetEffectivePogoPropertySite.getProperty(GetEffectivePogoPropertySite.java:
> >> 71)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callGroovyObjectGetProperty(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 240)
> >> at org.tellurium.object.UiObject.walkTo(UiObject.groovy:238)
> >> at org.tellurium.object.UiObject$walkTo.call(Unknown Source)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:
> >> 43)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 116)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 128)
> >> at org.tellurium.object.List.walkTo(List.groovy:341)
> >> at org.tellurium.object.List$walkTo.call(Unknown Source)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:
> >> 43)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 116)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 128)
> >> at org.tellurium.object.Container.walkTo(Container.groovy:156)
> >> at org.tellurium.object.Container$walkTo.call(Unknown Source)
> >> at org.tellurium.dsl.UiDslParser.walkTo(UiDslParser.groovy:69)
> >> at org.tellurium.dsl.UiDslParser$walkTo.call(Unknown Source)
> >> at
>
> >> org.tellurium.dsl.BaseDslContext.walkToWithException(BaseDslContext.groovy:
> >> 128)
> >> at org.tellurium.dsl.BaseDslContext
> >> $walkToWithException.callCurrent(Unknown Source)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallCurrent(CallSiteArray.java:
> >> 47)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 142)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 154)
> >> at
>
> >> org.tellurium.dsl.BaseDslContext.getAllTableCellText(BaseDslContext.groovy:
> >> 716)
> >> at org.tellurium.dsl.BaseDslContext
> >> $getAllTableCellText.callCurrent(Unknown Source)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallCurrent(CallSiteArray.java:
> >> 47)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 142)
> >> at
>
> >> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:
> >> 150)
> >> at
> >> module.DocumentShowModule.getValueForLabel(DocumentShowModule.groovy:
> >> 35)
> >> at
>
> >> test.DocumentShowTestCase.testDocumentLabelValuePairs(DocumentShowTestCase.java:
> >> 37)
> >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> at
> >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:
> >> 39)
> >> at
>
> >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:
> >> 25)
> >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >> at org.testng.internal.MethodHelper.invokeMethod(MethodHelper.java:
> >> 580)
> >> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:478)
> >> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:617)
> >> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:885)
> >> at
>
> >> org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:
> >> 126)
> >> at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:
> >> 110)
> >> at org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:712)
> >> at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:582)
> >> at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:477)
> >> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:324)
> >> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:319)
> >> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:292)
> >> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:198)
> >> at org.testng.TestNG.createAndRunSuiteRunners(TestNG.java:821)
> >> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:788)
> >> at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:708)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGExecutor.run(TestNGExecutor.java:
> >> 62)
> >> at
>
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGDirectoryTestSuite.execute(TestNGDirectoryTestSuite.java:
> >> 141)
> >> at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:177)
> >> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >> at
> >> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:
> >> 39)
> >> at
>
> >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:
> >> 25)
> >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >> at
>
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:
> >> 345)
> >> at
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:
> >> 1009)
>
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Graham
>
> >> On Apr 10, 9:56 am, John <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > BTW, for your first question if you only need to validate the key
> >> > value pairs
> >> > from the table, you can simply define the UI module as
>
> >> > ui.Table(uid: "keyValue", clocator: [class: "keyValueTable"]){
> >> > TextBox(uid: "{row: all, column: 1}", clocator: [tag: td], self:
> >> > "true")
> >> > TextBox(uid: "{row: all, column: 2}", clocator: [tag: td], self:
> >> > "true")
> >> > }
>
> >> > Then, call the following method to get back all table cell texts in
> >> > one call.
>
> >> > String[] texts = getAllTableCellText("keyValue")
>
> >> > After that, you can loop through the array to validate the key value
> >> > pairs.
> >> > Make sure the table can be located by itself. If not, you can embed it
> >> > inside
> >> > some other UI module.
>
> >> > More getAllTableCellText() examples can be found at
>
> >> >http://code.google.com/p/aost/wiki/UserGuide070AppendixA#Custom_UI_Ob.
> >> ..
>
> >> > Thanks,
>
> >> > Jian
> >> > On Apr 9, 12:57 pm, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > I thought about it a bit. Two ways come to my mind.
>
> >> > > The first one is to define an abstract UI object with variables such
> >> as
>
> >> > > ui.Table(uid: "keyValue", clocator: [class: "keyValueTable"]){
> >> > > TextBox(uid: "{row: any, column: 1} as p1, var key", clocator:
> >> [text:
> >> > > "key"], self: "true")
> >> > > TextBox(uid: "{row: any, column: 2} as p2, var value", clocator:
> >> > > [text: "value"], self: "true")
> >> > > }
>
> >> > > In the above UI module, I defined two variables: key and value.
>
> >> > > The abstract object could not be used directly and it must be
> >> instantiated
> >> > > with values binding
> >> > > to the variables. I need to come up with a mechanism to instantiate
> >> multiple
> >> > > instances based on
> >> > > the abstract objects. For example,
>
> >> > > spawn "keyValue.p1", "KA", [key: "AAA"]
> >> > > spawn "keyValue.p2", "V1", [key: "111"]
> >> > > spawn "keyValue.p1", "KB", [key: "BBB"]
> >> > > spawn "keyValue.p2", "V2", [key: "222"]
>
> >> > > where "KA", "KB", "V1", and "V2" are new IDs. The new instances will
> >> be
> >> > > inserted into the Table "keyValue".
> >> > > The key point here is to programmatically change the runtime UI
> >> module.
> >> > > After that, you can use
> >> > > "keyValue.KA", "keyValue.V1", "keyValue.KB", and "keyValue.V2" to
> >> reference
> >> > > them.
>
> >> > > The second option is to define a find() method for a UI object,
>
> >> > > find(Map attributes)
>
> >> > > In this way, the above method will first locate the UI object (i.e.,
> >> the
> >> > > table "keyValue" itself in the above example), then
> >> > > find its children or descendants by the given attributes. Probably, we
> >> can
> >> > > also assign a temporal uid for each found
> >> > > element like what getUiByTag does so that you can use the temporal uid
> >> to
> >> > > reference the found UI element.
>
> >> > > This changes will not make its way into 0.7.0 RC2. I will see if I can
> >> > > squeeze them in before 0.7.0 final release. If not, should
> >> > > be included in 0.8.0.
>
> >> > > Any suggestions and comments are welcome.
>
> >> > > Thanks,
>
> >> > > Jian
>
> >> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:19 PM, John <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > Hi Graham,
>
> >> > > > Great questions.
>
> >> > > > Tellurium does support direct Selenium calls with the following
> >> > > > method,
>
> >> > > > def customDirectCall(String method, Object[] args);
>
> >> > > > You can still programmatically generate the runtime xpath and then
> >> > > > call the
> >> > > > above method to Selenium directly.
>
> >> > > > For more elegant solutions, it would be great if Tellurium could
> >> > > > support dynamic
> >> > > > attributes in the UI module. For example, for your first question,
> >> if
> >> > > > Tellurium UDL
> >> > > > could define some attributes as dynamic and do lazy binding at
> >> > > > runtime, your problem
> >> > > > could be solved. But to be honest, I haven't thought of such use
> >> cases
> >> > > > yet. I will
> >> > > > think it over and try to add this feature to UDL and core.
>
> >> > > > For your second question, Tellurium provides the following method
>
> >> > > > UiByTagResponse getUiByTag(String tag, Map filters);
>
> >> > > > to return temporal uids for the giving tag and attributes. Then you
> >> > > > can use these uids
> >> > > > in the same way as other predefined uids in a UI module. More
> >> details
> >> > > > here,
>
> >>http://code.google.com/p/aost/wiki/Tellurium070Update#Get_UIs_by_Tag_...
>
> >> > > > I will follow up with you about my thoughts of dynamic attributes in
> >> > > > UDL and core.
>
> >> > > > Thanks,
>
> >> > > > Jian
>
> >> > > > On Apr 7, 9:57 pm, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > Hi All,
>
> >> > > > > My company is considering migrating from Selenium to Tellurium for
> >> one
> >> > > > > of our projects. However we are a little concerned about losing
> >> some
> >> > > > > test functionality that is currently enjoyed through the
> >> utilization
> >> > > > > of plain old Selenium. I would like to give some examples of the
> >> test
> >> > > > > functionality and then pose the question – how can I replicate
> >> this
> >> > > > > test functionality using Tellurium?
>
> >> > > > > Example A - Verifying the content of a key/value pair table
>
> >> > > > > I have a sequence of key/value pairs loaded from a test data file
> >> into
> >> > > > > a groovy map like so:
>
> >> > > > > ['AAA': '111',
> >> > > > > 'BBB': '222',
> >> > > > > 'CCC': '333']
>
> >> > > > > These pairs represent the expected content of a table to be
> >> tested,
> >> > > > > they might be rendered in html like so:
>
> >> > > > > <table class='keyValueTable'>
> >> > > > > <tr>
> >> > > > > <td>AAA</td><td>111</td>
> >> > > > > </tr>
> >> > > > > <tr>
> >> > > > > <td>BBB</td><td>222</td>
> >> > > > > </tr>
> >> > > > > <tr>
> >> > > > > <td>CCC</td><td>333</td>
> >> > > > > </tr>
> >> > > > > </table>
>
> >> > > > > Using Selenium I can programmatically generate the xpath for each
> >> key/
> >> > > > > value pair and assert the presence of the xpath.
>
> >> > > > > String cellType = "td";
> >> > > > > String tableLocator = "//tab...@id='" + tableId + "']";
> >> > > > > String valueLocator = tableLocator + "//" + cellType +
> >> > > > > "[...@class='label' and .='" + key + "']/following-sibling::"+
> >> cellType;
>
> >> > > > > Using Tellurium, how could I assert that the pairs in my test data
> >> > > > > exist in the html table, considering that:
>
> >> > > > > • The order of the pairs in the test data does not necessarily
> >> > > > > represent the order of the pairs in the rendered html
> >> > > > > • The test data files may be updated frequently, i.e. one day
> >> there
> >> > > > > may be 10 pairs, then the next there may be 30, and the new pairs
> >> > > > > won’t necessarily be appended to the end of the test file.
> >> > > > > • I don’t want to define each and every pair as elements
> >> within a UI
> >> > > > > module, the test must be data driven.
> >> > > > > • The order of pairs in the test data may change i.e.
> >> referencing
> >> > > > rows
> >> > > > > by index is too brittle.
>
> >> > > > > Example B - Utilisation of programmatically generated element ids
>
> >> > > > > Using Selenium if I have an element that I wish to interact with
> >> and I
> >> > > > > need to generate a unique id attribute for the element I can
> >> > > > > programmatically generate the id and then compose some xpath to
> >> > > > > reference said element. For example, if I have a series of links
> >> with
> >> > > > > composite ids:
>
> >> > > > > <a id=”111_222”>View</a>
> >> > > > > <a id=”333_444”>View</a>
> >> > > > > <a id=”555_666”>View</a>
>
> >> > > > > And my test data file looks like this
> >> > > > > 111|222
> >> > > > > 333|444
> >> > > > > 555|666
>
> >> > > > > Using Selenium I would programmatically generate the xpath
> >> locators:
>
> >> > > > > //inp...@id='${idLeft}_${idRight}']
>
> >> > > > > And interact with the links using Selenium commands and the
> >> generated
> >> > > > > xpath.
>
> >> > > > > Some questions:
>
> >> > > > > 1. How could I interact with these links using Tellurium
> >> (must be
> >> > > > data
> >> > > > > driven)
> >> > > > > 2. Does the Tellurium API allow me to call Selenium commands
> >> > > > directly?
>
> >> > > > > I guess the crux of this post is about dynamic attributes in
> >> Tellurium
> >> > > > > tests. I really like the clean representation of the relevant
> >> parts of
> >> > > > > a DOM that Tellurium Modules bring, but I can't see how I can
> >> perform
> >> > > > > data driven testing with what appears to be largely static DOM
> >> > > > > definitions.
>
> >> > > > > Regards,
>
> >> > > > > Graham
>
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > > > "tellurium-users" group.
> >> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > > [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]>
> >> <tellurium-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >> > > > .
> >> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.-Hide quoted
> >> text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "tellurium-users" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "tellurium-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tellurium-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
