Not too many changes so far, pretty close to 0.7.0. But you may need to update TelluriumConfig.groovy file. More details here:
http://code.google.com/p/aost/wiki/WhatsNewInTellurium080 Thanks, Jian On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Rudy Bonefas <[email protected]> wrote: > Alright I'll give that a try, how stable is 0.8 overall? > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jian Fang <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sorry, the code I showed was on trunk/core, i.e., 0.8.0, where the locator >> has been fixed already. You can simply use 0.8.0 snapshot jar instead of >> 0.7.0. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jian >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rudy Bonefas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I just pulled down the 0.7 source at work. WidgetDSLContext does NOT >>> have a locator member, and the Widget Class does NOT set it. I'll try >>> making these changes to my local copy and rebuilding the jar. I'm going to >>> override the UIObject locator setter in Widget so that when the >>> UIObjectBuilder internBuild sets the objects locator I can then set the >>> WidgetDSLContexts locator >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Jian Fang <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Rudy, >>>> >>>> You are right about the delegate annotation. But I defined a locator >>>> attribute in the WidgetDslContent class >>>> and set its locator as the parent locator. >>>> >>>> public Widget(){ >>>> i18nBundle = Environment.instance.myResourceBundle(); >>>> dsl = new WidgetDslContext(); >>>> dsl.locator = this.locator; >>>> ui = dsl.ui; >>>> } >>>> >>>> As far as I understand, Groovy comes with default setters and getters, >>>> shouldn't >>>> dsl.locator = this.locator >>>> >>>> is actually a setter? >>>> >>>> dsl.setLocator(this.locator) >>>> >>>> I will double check the jQuery example from the release package and let >>>> you know about the result soon. >>>> >>>> But something was wrong there since you got the error. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jian >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Rudy Bonefas <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jian, >>>>> >>>>> Heres my problem. >>>>> >>>>> I build my ExtJS Widget following your jquery example. However when I >>>>> run my app using tellurium 0.7 >>>>> i get the following stack trace >>>>> groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: locator for >>>>> class: org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.WidgetDslContext >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>> org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.WidgetDslContext.locatorMappingWithOption(WidgetDslContext.groovy: >>>>> 31) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>> org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.WidgetDslContext.locatorMapping(WidgetDslContext.groovy: >>>>> 23) >>>>> ... at org.telluriumsource.dsl.BaseDslContext >>>>> $_type_closure9.doCall(BaseDslContext.groovy:208) >>>>> ... at >>>>> org.telluriumsource.ui.object.InputBox.type(InputBox.groovy:22) >>>>> at org.telluriumsource.ui.object.InputBox$type.call(Unknown >>>>> Source) >>>>> at >>>>> org.telluriumsource.dsl.BaseDslContext.type(BaseDslContext.groovy: >>>>> 207) >>>>> at org.telluriumsource.dsl.BaseDslContext$type.call(Unknown >>>>> Source) >>>>> at org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.Widget.type(Widget.groovy) >>>>> at org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.Widget$type.callCurrent(Unknown >>>>> Source) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>> org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.extjs.object.ComboBox.setType(ComboBox.groovy: >>>>> 32) >>>>> at >>>>> org.telluriumsource.ui.object.UiObject.invokeMethod(UiObject.groovy) >>>>> at >>>>> org.telluriumsource.dsl.DslContext.onWidget(DslContext.groovy:56) >>>>> at >>>>> uimodule.ListingFormModule.setType(ListingFormModule.groovy:24) >>>>> at uimodule.ListingFormModule$setType.call(Unknown Source) >>>>> at test.TestCase1.testAddListing(TestCase1.groovy:39) >>>>> >>>>> I believe the problem is your use of the @Delagate annotation in the >>>>> Widget class in respect to WidgetDSLContext >>>>> >>>>> The WidgetDSLContext method locationMappingWithOption references >>>>> this.locator under the mistaken belief that the delegate class has >>>>> access to the members of its >>>>> outer containing class (in this case Widgets parent UIObject which >>>>> does indeed have its locator member set). This is not how delegates >>>>> work. Designating a member as a delegate allows >>>>> you to invoke all of the delegates methods on the container class but >>>>> these invocations are merely DELEGATED to the delegate member, they do >>>>> not occur in the context of the outer class. Therefore the this in >>>>> this.locator >>>>> in locationMappingWithOption is the WidgetDSLContext member 'dsl' in >>>>> the Widget class and it has no locator. If you don't believe me try >>>>> running the following 2 small classes: >>>>> >>>>> class B { >>>>> >>>>> public showMeTheLocator() >>>>> { >>>>> println locator; >>>>> } >>>>> } >>>>> class A { >>>>> >>>>> @Delegate >>>>> B b = new B(); >>>>> >>>>> def locator = "I AM THIS CLASSES LOCATOR" >>>>> >>>>> public static void main(String[] args) >>>>> { >>>>> A a = new A(); >>>>> a.showMeTheLocator() >>>>> } >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> B simply cannot access A's locator member. we're delegating not >>>>> inheriting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I believe the jquery example was built under 0.6; in the >>>>> DateTimePickerBuilder it calls datepicker.dsl.locator = >>>>> datepicker.locator, This does not work in 0.7 for 2 reasons, 1) the >>>>> dsl member is private and 2) even if it were'nt, it has no locator >>>>> member. >>>>> >>>>> Rudy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 21, 10:31 pm, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > Widget object extends UiObject and thus, it has a locator attribute. >>>>> Please >>>>> > see the jquery-ui project >>>>> > as a reference. >>>>> > >>>>> > But I want to remove the locator in the widget object in the future >>>>> because >>>>> > a widget should be an encapsulation of >>>>> > a set of UIs and it only needs options to define itself. To further >>>>> define >>>>> > the location of a widget, you can specify the >>>>> > locator of the UI object that references the widget. >>>>> > >>>>> > Could you tell me your use case that you need a locator for the >>>>> widget? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>> > Jian >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Rudy Bonefas <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > Is it possible to use a clocator in a widget class definition? I >>>>> > > tried this but at run time I get >>>>> > >>>>> > > groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: locator for >>>>> > > class: org.telluriumsource.ui.widget.WidgetDslContext >>>>> > > at >>>>> > >>>>> > > >>>>> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.ScriptBytecodeAdapter.unwrap(ScriptBytecodeAdap >>>>> ter.java: >>>>> > > 49) >>>>> > >>>>> > > Seems a shame if this is true since the composite locator allows >>>>> me >>>>> > > to not have to write a full XPath query. >>>>> > >>>>> > > -- >>>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>> > > "tellurium-users" group. >>>>> > > To post to this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> > > [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]> >>>>> <tellurium-users%2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com> >>>>> > > . >>>>> > > For more options, visit this group at >>>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tellurium-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
