Or you could call the diagnose(uid) method to see if there are any closest
matches there. More details here:

http://code.google.com/p/aost/wiki/PracticalUseOfDiagnose

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you did not call useTelluriumEngine(true) explicitly, Tellurium will
> work in the first mode, i.e.,
> Tellurium core generates runtime locators and then call Selenium APIs.
>
> It is really wired that Tellurium cannot find the element with the id
> attribute. Could you debug your
> test and put a breakpoint at the code where the input field becomes
> visible? After the test stops
> there, you can use DOM Inspector or the following way to check if the input
> field is indeed there
> at that time. Sometimes, Javascript framework likes to change the runtime
> id.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/aost/wiki/TelluriumJQueryFirebug
>
> Or you could try out Tellurium 0.8.0 snapshot, which at least dump out the
> JavaScript error stack
> for you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jian
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Setting cacheable="false" didn't make a difference, though I don't
>> know whether I'm using Tellurium Core or Tellurium New Engine. Do you
>> know where I could find that information?
>>
>> I've also tried defining a new UI module just for that input box,
>> making sure to "defineUi" after the element was visible on the page,
>> with no luck.
>>
>> Lastly, here's a stack trace from trying to type to my mystery
>> element, and the locator I'm using:
>>
>> InputBox(uid: "inputField", cacheable: "false", clocator:
>> [id:"unique_id"])
>>
>> com.thoughtworks.selenium.SeleniumException: ERROR: Element
>> uimcal={"rid":"page.inputField","locator":"jquery=#unique_id"} not
>> found
>>        at
>>
>> com.thoughtworks.selenium.HttpCommandProcessor.throwAssertionFailureExceptionOrError(HttpCommandProcessor.java:
>> 97)
>>        at
>>
>> com.thoughtworks.selenium.HttpCommandProcessor.doCommand(HttpCommandProcessor.java:
>> 91)
>>        at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor93.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>        at
>>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:
>> 25)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>        at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite
>> $PojoCachedMethodSiteNoUnwrapNoCoerce.invoke(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:
>> 229)
>>        at
>>
>> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite.call(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:
>> 52)
>>        at
>>
>> org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:
>> 128)
>>        at
>>
>> org.telluriumsource.component.connector.CustomSelenium.getBundleResponse(CustomSelenium.groovy:
>> 257)
>>        at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor92.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>        at
>>
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:
>> 25)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>        at
>> org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:
>> 88)
>>        at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:233)
>>        .... and lots more, but this seemed like the important bit.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the help, btw!
>>
>>
>> On Jan 5, 12:49 pm, Jian Fang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Matt,
>> >
>> > Are you using Tellurium Core to generate runtime locators or using
>> Tellurium
>> > new engine
>> > for group locating?
>> >
>> > Since the input field is hidden initially, Tellurium new Engine may have
>> > problem to locate
>> > it. You could set the "cacheable" attribute of the Input field to be
>> false
>> > to see if you can
>> > workaround this problem.
>> >
>> > If it is the former case, please post the error stack here.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jian
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> >
>> > > I've been having a lot of success with Tellurium, but I've stumbled
>> > > across an input field that I can't seem to get my tests to recognize.
>> > > I was wondering if anyone might have an idea for properly locating the
>> > > field?
>> >
>> > > The facts are these:
>> > > * I'm targeting the input field using it's ID attribute, which is
>> > > unique (this was the first thing I checked...).
>> > > * The input field is initially hidden, and displayed with JavaScript
>> > > (Prototype framework) once other portions of the form are filled out.
>> > > * "isElementPresent" returns false before and after the input field is
>> > > made visible. Every other input field on the page returns "true" when
>> > > tested.
>> > > * This one input field has an event listener (Prototype "Event")
>> > > attached to it, which changes the input field's class when it receives
>> > > focus/blur events (why didn't they use CSS onfocus/onblur like they
>> > > did on every other input field on the page? No clue...).
>> >
>> > > I was wondering if the event listener is somehow keeping Tellurium
>> > > from finding the input field? Or if something else could be getting in
>> > > the way? Any suggestions on where to look for a solution/get a clearer
>> > > idea of what's going wrong would be greatly appreciated!
>> >
>> > > I'd love to provide more details, but I'm limited in what I can say
>> > > (company policy and all that jazz...).
>> >
>> > > Thanks for the help!
>> > >  - Matt
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > > "tellurium-users" group.
>> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> .
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]>
>> <tellurium-users%[email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]>
>> >
>> > > .
>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "tellurium-users" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<tellurium-users%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tellurium-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tellurium-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to