Hi Bryce,
We have 4 eNB's and 90 UE's and not seeing any of those kinds of issues.
EPC is on 0606.00729
eNB's on 0606.04013
UE's are on a mix of 01.01.02.082, 01.01.02.089, 01.01.02.089.002 and
1 UE on 01.01.02.105
First make sure you are putting tickets in to Telrad, they are very
fast at responding and always figures out what is going on (except my
MTU issue and we are working on that).
Next is interference, as you know that can cause all kinds of
issues. I was self interfering for a while and had issues (9 Months
ago).
I have found that if the eNB loses the S1 for a little bit, it
sometimes will not connect back to the EPC and the eNB will hold on
to the UE's. I have a second eNB for them to shift over to and that
does not always happen. I have a ticket in about it and Telrad knows
about it.
I suggest you take a UE back to an older version of firmware and see
if its cleans it up. The one UE on 01.01.02.105 has not been having
issues that I know of, but I will roll it out to my employees and do
some testing to see.
Thanks,
Matt Carpenter
Amarillo Wireless
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Bryce Duchcherer <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
We are still having huge issues after the upgrade!
Once we rolled out the new 105 software on the CPE's we are
having issues with them staying connected.
The connection drops, but show active in the EPC. When booted
they do not come back. They sometimes come back after a power
cycle of the CPE. It usually doesn't last long though before the
connection drops again.
Not to mention all the speed issues.
We invested in LTE technology to improve service for our
customers, but we have done the opposite. We are even having
customers ask to be put back on their old equipment.
Anyone else seeing issues like this?
Bryce Duchcherer
NETAGO
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Nick Dewar
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 9:04
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Telrad Digest, Vol 22, Issue 23
Hi All,
I am glad to see there was lots of activity on the forums last
week, was on vacation and apologize for the late response. I
will try to address a few of the points discussed
- major CINR/ RSRP delta on the CPE7K is addressed in a new
release. This release is about to be GA. The same release also
introduces increased MTU support, PCI locking and a disconnect
issue. If you have one off cases experiencing any of those
issues please engage with support so we can track and assist.
The non-official release can be downloaded from the link below
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mrlomfmherxhg8t/FW-Telrad_ODU_01.01.02.105.ipk?dl=0
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/mrlomfmherxhg8t/FW-Telrad_ODU_01.01.02.105.ipk?dl=0>
- anytime you migrate from WiMAX to LTE it is absolutely critical
that a detailed RF plan is completed. Especially when there are
multiple WiMAX vendors deployed with limited sync capabilities.
WiMAX RSSI is measured of a preamble which is boosted above all
the data sub carriers. In LTE the RSRP is the avg measured power
of the ref symbols which is not boosted above the data like the
preamble in WiMAX. Some may have noticed that in WiMAX a 10dB
CINR is hardly functional but in LTE a 10dB CINR will push a
significant amount of data. This is because the ref signal
measurement is equal of that of the data resource elements in LTE
Steve Cole - we want to get you squared away and can have boots
on the ground next week. The EPC issue you are experiencing is
related to a DHCP relay bug we identified in the logs from your
system and a new version is already in regression testing.
Switching to proxy mode could server as work around in the meantime
Regards
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: August 7, 2016 1:00 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Telrad Digest, Vol 22, Issue 23
Send Telrad mailing list submissions to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific than "Re: Contents of Telrad digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Wimax to LTE (Steve Cole)
2. Re: Wimax to LTE (Matthew Carpenter)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:16:25 -0400
From: Steve Cole <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Wimax to LTE
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 8/4/2016 8:46 AM, Skywerx Support wrote:
> I have enb's with over 80 clients offering mixed packages of 3,
5, 10, 15, and 20 Mbps services. No complaints here. You
obviously have something messed up.
Eh, no. 10Mhz is the biggest channel we can run and we did some
downtilt. When we can go higher channel widths (we are our own
worst interference with WiMax), and pull out the barrier
channels, it will be better. But that won't fix the EPC, it won't
fix the RF power, and it won't fix the reconnect issue.
The rest we have plenty of capacity. The bottleneck at present
is Telrad, no questions about it.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:29:38 -0500
From: Matthew Carpenter <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Telrad] Wimax to LTE
To: Telrad List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Message-ID:
<CAEBu8Bj2qwsXBXDaH3N2Vc3mQNY2eA=1=s_wAjd-9QkY7b=u...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
We are using the EPC in a central/datacenter configuration. The
eNB's are fed by fiber or by licensed link.
Sure we have an issue once in a while, Telrad support jumps on it
and gets it fixed quickly.
82 UE's over 4 eNB's and running good. I am in 2x4(receive) mode
currently.
What going on with RF power?
Not seeing the reconnect issues that you guys have been talking
about. Is the UE just going to sleep?
MattCarpenter
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Steve Cole <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> On 8/4/2016 8:46 AM, Skywerx Support wrote:
> > I have enb's with over 80 clients offering mixed packages of
3, 5,
> > 10,
> 15, and 20 Mbps services. No complaints here. You obviously have
> something messed up.
> Eh, no. 10Mhz is the biggest channel we can run and we did some
> downtilt. When we can go higher channel widths (we are our own
worst
> interference with WiMax), and pull out the barrier channels, it
will
> be better. But that won't fix the EPC, it won't fix the RF
power, and
> it won't fix the reconnect issue.
>
> The rest we have plenty of capacity. The bottleneck at present is
> Telrad, no questions about it.
> _______________________________________________
> Telrad mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
>
--
*Matthew Carpenter*
*806-316-5071 <tel:806-316-5071> office*
*806-236-9558 <tel:806-236-9558> cell*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/telrad/attachments/20160807/457b5c11/attachment-0001.html
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/private/telrad/attachments/20160807/457b5c11/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
End of Telrad Digest, Vol 22, Issue 23
**************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned
by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code,
vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned
by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code,
vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
<http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad>
--
*Matthew Carpenter*
*806-316-5071 office*
*806-236-9558 cell*
_______________________________________________
Telrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
