As for your suggestion I wrote in my posting from 30.05.2005 15:07 that JahiaField.loadField(...) also calls theField.getValue() right after theField.load() so moving the dispatching from JahiaApplicationField.load() to JahiaApplicationField.getValue() would not bring us anything unless you remove the theField.getValue() calls from JahiaField.loadField(...)and replace them with getRawValue() but I wonder what side-effects you will get then.
Greetings,
Benjamin Papez
System Architect
***************************************************
COMMARO mobile trading systems GmbH
Lakeside B04
A-9020 Klagenfurt - Austria/Europe
phone: +43 (463) 298505-38
fax: +43 (463) 298505-22
***************************************************
| Serge Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01.06.2005 11:55
|
|
Hi Benjamin,
I'm sorry I didn't have time to answer this thread earlier.
Jahia fields have to values, the "rawValue" and the "value". The
rawValue is the value that comes from the database. My idea was move the
code to the getValue() and in the load method not yet set the value, but
do it *one time only* in the getValue call. This should be the least
intrusive way of doing it.
What I mean is that you should overload the getValue from JahiaField
into JahiaApplicationField, and put the logic there. Something along the
lines of
public String getValue() {
if (fieldValue == null) {
/** app dispatching comes here *//
fieldValue = ...
}
}
As for your solution, I don't think it's that practical because I know
of a lot of templates that will access the field value through
JahiaField.getValue call.
Regards,
Serge Huber.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> I have solved this like that:
>
> I removed the following code from JahiaApplicationField.load(...)
>
> logger.debug("Loading application field...");
> ContentApplicationField contentApplicationField =
> (ContentApplicationField)ContentApplicationField
> .getField(fieldBean.getId());
> logger.debug("value=" + value);
>
> String val = contentApplicationField.getValue(jData.params());
>
> value = JahiaTools.replacePattern(FormDataManager.getInstance()
> .htmlEncode(val), "@", "@");
>
> and moved it to ApplicationFieldTag.readValue(...). This way the
> dispatching to the application works only with the
> <content:application> tag if the display flag is set to true
> [default]. For now I haven't encountered any problems, but I wonder if
> this solution can be contributed as you have to care about migration
> of existing applications and maybe somebody uses the integration of
> applications without the <content:application> tag, but using the
> JahiaApplicationField.getValue() directly.
>
> Greetings,
> Benjamin
>
> ----- Forwarded by Benjamin Papez/COMMARO/AT on 01.06.2005 07:47 -----
> *Benjamin Papez/COMMARO/AT*
>
> 30.05.2005 15:07
>
>
> To
> <[email protected]>
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: How to prevent triggering a request to application on application
> loadFieldLink
> <Notes:///C1256DE5002ABE51/A4D87D90E1B19842852564FF006DED4E/EE7FDF0010570B00C125700D0035D85D>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello Serge,
>
> well, we could contribute, but moving the dispatching from load() to
> getValue() is not helping as in JahiaField.loadField(...) you first call
>
> theField.load (loadFlag, jParams);
>
> and right afterwards you call
>
> if (theField.getValue () != null && theField.getValue ().equals
> ("<empty>")) {
> theField.setValue ("");
> }
>
> So if we just move the dispatching to getValue() it will still be
> dispatched everytime a JahiaField.loadField() is called. Can you give
> us some more hints, how we could solve that and what we should care
> about.
>
> Greetings,
> Benjamin
>
>
> *Serge Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>
> 26.05.2005 11:48
> Please respond to
> <[email protected]>
>
>
> To
> [email protected]
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: How to prevent triggering a request to application on application
> loadField
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Unfortunately not with the current implementation. This is one thing
> that has been on my todo list for some time but I never found the time
> to do it. My idea was to move the dispatching to the getValue call in
> the application field. I don't know when I'll get around to do this, but
> another way to speed it up is to contribute it :)
>
> cheers,
> Serge...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Similar to the site settings we have on the startpage a container with
> > web application fields, which we set with specific webapps to allow
> > absolute field addressing from several other pages. On the startpage
> > there is only the container with the application field, but this web
> > application itself is not displayed on the startpage. Nevertheless
> > when accessing the startpage, loadField is called for the "hidden"
> > webapp field and there a request is sent to the servlet of the
> > application. Is it possible to prevent triggering this request if the
> > field is not shown really?
> >
> > Benjamin Papez
>
