Jonas Liljegren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting the code instead of the print functions. Just like PHP.
Just for the record, there's a template system for PHP that is very much like TT2: http://www.phpinsider.com/php/code/Smarty/ It allows for a similar template system under PHP that TT2 does under Perl. I've always preferred templates for creating information-centric web pages over the component model that most other in-page server-side scripting offers (which I prefer for more function-centric applications that don't require so much fluidity in presentation). > > > Most of the time it's better to separate > > > > > > - data > > > - configuration > > > - logic > > > - presentation > > > > All templating systems allow you to do this. I'm a rank beginner at OOD, but that's what I believe they call the Model (data) -View (presentation) -Controller (logic & configuration) pattern. That's how I've always looked at TT2, while Mason or other embeded Perl methods or straight PHP always seemed more like a component framework. Each has its place. MSM Michael S. Manley Application Development Mgr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] T: 312.373.2817 F: 312.751.8073 Nihil tam munitum quod non expugnari pecuna possit. "Software encapsulates skill." Bruce Schneier's 2nd Natural Law of the Digital World
