On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:21:36AM +0200, Jonas Liljegren wrote: > The import() function/method is not enough. It would be better if > .import (without parameters) would import to the current namespace.
It does: [% import(myhash) %] (you don't need the leading '.') Is that what you mean? Or were you thinking of: [% myhash.import %] If that's the case, then I must disagree. I think it would be too confusing to have [% myhash.import(another) %] meaning "import values of another into myhash", as it currently is, and [% myhash.import %] meaning "import values of myhash into the root". In one, myhash is the subject, in the other it's the object. > But it wouldn't hur to also have a IMPORT directive. True. A
