> > [% FOREACH Item = List %]
> > Item [% loop.count %] [% Item %]
> > [% ELSE %]
> > No items found
> > [% END %]
> I wonder if it might be better to have a new construct instead of FOREACH?
> For example, something like this (off the top of my head):
> [% LOOP item = list %]
> <tr><td>[% item %]</td></tr>
> [% BEFORE %]
> <table>
> [% AFTER %]
> </table>
> [% EMPTY %]
> There are no items in the list.
> [% END %]
Yes, but this is equivalent to
<table>
[% LOOP item = list %]
<tr><td>[% item %]</td></tr>
[% EMPTY %]
There are no items in the list.
[% END %]
</table>
So, is it really interesting ?
And, in english, I can say something like "I loop else".... [ not sot much,
after all ;o) ]
So,
<table>
[% LOOP item = list %]
<tr><td>[% item %]</td></tr>
[% ELSE %]
There are no items in the list.
[% END %]
</table>
could be more readable.
Therefore, we can say that LOOP is an alias to FOREACH, and ELSE should be
added to the FOREACH construct.
kktos
