Andy Wardley wrote:

>This gets my award for "Most Annoying Limitation in the TT2 Parser".  I
>don't think it can be solved easily in the state-driven TT2 parser, but 
>it has already been "fixed" in the recursive descent TT3 parser.  This is 
>next on my list of TT3 modules to finish so hopefully we'll be able to 
>graft the v3 parser into v2 at some point in the future.
>
How's the performance of TT3 relative to TT2?  Are performance 
implications being considered in its development?  I suppose that 
parsing performance makes no difference once the template is compiled, 
but TT performance in general is important for web applications that use 
it to generate their interface.

-myk




Reply via email to