Parker, Brian wrote:
>>
>>On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 06:23:35PM -0400, Parker, Brian wrote:
>>
>>>That makes sense. I bet you're right. I wonder if 'sort' could be a
>>>no-op method for a scalar to handle this case.
>>
>>That would probably be a good idea.
>>
>
>
> OK, I vote for the following patch. Looks like someone had the same idea for the
>'item' method. Sorry, I don't have a way to test a change to the .xs file.
>
> $ diff -Naur orig_Stash.pm Stash.pm
> --- orig_Stash.pm 2002-07-02 19:07:06.000000000 -0500
> +++ Stash.pm 2002-07-02 19:07:20.000000000 -0500
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> };
>
> $SCALAR_OPS = {
> + 'sort' => sub { $_[0] },
I'd rather see it as:
+ 'sort' => sub { die "Cannot sort a scalar ($_[0])" },
why in the world you will code your templating logic to sort scalars?
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
