Joe Johnston wrote:
No, but Template Toolkit has been benchmarked. See http://www.chamas.com/bench/.Has anyone benchmarked the performance of Apache::Templates?
That's extremely low for static pages. On a modern machine you should be getting more like 1000 - 3000.Using the ab tool, I'm able to serve about 110 static HTML pages per second.
It is normal for dynamic pages of any kind to be at least 50% slower than static ones. Template Toolkit has come in at about 70% slower than static pages in tests that I've seen, which is still faster than most of the other options. Naturally the template you use has a huge effect here.Using a very simple tt2 (shown below), the throughput drops to 17 pages per second. Is this precipitous drop normal?
> Any thoughts on how I improve the performance?
Write your own handler instead of using Apache::Template. It won't make a huge difference though. When you put some significant code into your template you will find that most of the time is spent running your code, not Template Toolkit.
- Perrin
_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/templates
