----- Original Message ----- From: Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, March 7, 2003 12:34 pm Subject: Re: [Templates] Best equivalent to [% INCLUDE http://... %]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Good idea, but I don't think it will work if my output is, say, an > > HTML table. I'd like to be able to something a bit more generic. > > However, until I get that worked out, I'll use your idea. Thanks! > > But you can't insert an image directly into an HTML table without > an > <img> tag. I'm confused :-) > > <light dawns> > > Er... is this what you meant? > > [% INCLUDE foo.html.tmpl > report_id = "A" > view_id = "B" %] > > ? That's a way of invoking templates from other templates with > parameters. My templates are stored in a database, not in the filesystem. I want to be able to do something that looks precisely the same (or very close), but loads a template from a URL instead of a local file. Doug Gorley | [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
