"Mark Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yeah, when I was looking at TT before starting to use it fro the > > current project, I was struck by the amount of programming language > > already being added. What struck *me* was that I'd rather have perl > > than some new special programming language, actually. Or PHP, if I > > have to. :-) > > The problem with in-line perl or PHP is that you often wind up > wanting to seperate the display level code from the data generation > code and you are right back to wanting a template system. If you think > I'm kidding look at how many PHP projects there are that implement > templates... http://smarty.php.net/ is the biggest that I know of but > there are plenty more.
Yes, that's really true. But I think I actually want *the same* programming environment for each, really; I think what I really want is for the distinction between "form" and "content" to be a completely human-decided distinction. Actually, for niceness of environment, what I really like is HTML::Mason, but I hear it takes some, um, care, to make busy sites not beat the CPU to death, and it's not really very friendly to a virtual-server environment. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <noguns-nomoney.com> <www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera mailing lists: <dragaera.info/> _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
