Oops ... that was line 216, not 16 ... grrr

--- David Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And they say Perl isn't line noise.
In this case ... i'd have to agree. Both should
have the same "final results," but they clearly
do not. Something else is intervening i suspect.

> Could this be to do with DBI.pm changing
> recently (ie recent whinges
> about not supporting old Perls) or TT changing
> its DWIM handling
> of the abovesuch constructs?

I haven't the foggiest idea. I will submit a bug
over at rt.cpan however, FWIW.

thanks again,
jeffa

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates

Reply via email to