Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > Actually, for this syntax, you'd simply return from the plugin > constructor with a coderef that returns coderefs (a filter factory) > rather than a plugin object. I'm not sure that's permitted by the > protocol though. Andy? Is that cheating?
Nope. It's a bit of a kludge, but it's definately fair game. A _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
