> > Being a person who for some time used latex filter to generate PDF
> > I feel fairly sure that this is the WRONG way. The bare problem of
> > leaving/trailing spaces/empty lines which are easily left by
> > designers shows this
> 
> Actually, PDF is rather tolerant to extra lines and spaces, as it is
> mostly text-based except for embedded images, which were the cause of
> problem here.

At least acrobat reader does not display PDF file if it contains an
extra empty line on the beginning. Tried.

> > no support for generating many files latexed together - like main
> > document and the images etc).
> 
> Why? This is exactly what I am doing, and it works just fine. (Well,
> not too fine, but that is a problem of weird and convoluted support
> for image embedding in TeX, and not a problem in TT).

In case you are to generate both the main document and some things it
uses (like dynamically created images or parts) it is natural to
create them within the same temporary directory. Do it with the latex
filter... Similar problems arise when you want to do some
postsprocessing (like generate ps file and then convert it to tiff for
faxing) or customize TeX command line (like adding -translate-file).

It is also worth mentioning that using latex filter you must either
load the whole file into memory or perform unnecessary copy of it.

And to finalize: I am not criticizing the current latex filter
implementation - given the environment it works in it is fairly
good. But in my opinion the idea of running TeX as TT filter is
flawed.

-- 
( Marcin Kasperski   | Users typically do not know exactly what they want and )
( http://www.mk.w.pl |  are unable to articulate all that they know. (Parnas) )
(---------------------------------------------------------------------------- )
( Sztuczki i kruczki w C++: http://www.mk.w.pl/porady/porady_cplusplus        )

_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates

Reply via email to