* Christopher Taranto <christopher at tokpela.com> [2004/07/01 21:47]: > > DH> sure. If I re-write it (which I will if no one objects), ttree might > DH> just become a wrapper around tsite -p ttree, but the input (options, > DH> etc) and output will stay the same. > > My view is that TTree should be a module upon which a ttree script is > written. This way you can utilize a TTree module within other scripts.
A long time ago, I started a branch on lib/Template/Config.pm and bin/ttree that abstracts out the configuration bits from ttree, so that they could be reused. It moved the read_config function from ttree to Template::Config. You could expand upon this idea; I didn't get the chance to. (darren) -- Good night, McKinney, Texas, wherever you are.
pgp7vQ7oSBoOW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
