On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 13:14, Todd Freeman wrote: > Heh... I once said that... then I saw the performance numbers from our Apache2 test > box...
Yeah, Apache 1 has such poor performance that nearly all of the largest sites in the world use it... Seriously, the mod_perl benchmarks I've seen put the performance about the same. It may be different for static files, but I don't serve static files from my mod_perl server. > Apache2 is stable these days. It is what the apache guys are doing continued > development on. Apache 1 is fully-supported, and will continue to be. > If you are doing new development I would highly suggest using Apache 2 > with mod_perl2 to do it under. If not you are just shooting yourself > in the foot by putting off the change for a little while. I'm glad to see people using mod_perl 2, but there is nothing at all wrong with using Apache 1 for new development. It is not going away, and it is the most common platform for new mod_perl development at this time. - Perrin _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
